Teaching controversial issues raises challenges for both teachers and school directors.


However, being able to discuss sensitive and controversial issues in a respectful way is a vital skill in a democratic culture.

Schools must be places where students feel safe to engage in debates with people who have different opinions. Through the careful management of discussions on controversial issues, schools can promote freedom of expression, as well as inclusion, tolerance, and human rights and prevent, or counter, the use of hate speech by students.

To achieve this, a school action plan on managing controversial issues – which provides staff training – should be adopted as a priority.
 


Facts & Figures

71% of teachers and school leaders surveyed agreed that it is very important that all students in their school express their views openly, even when their views might be controversial.[1]

In response to the question, ‘How valuable is the study of the Holocaust for primary children?’ 88% of teachers viewed Holocaust teaching to be either ‘worthwhile’ or ‘very valuable’ to the primary pupil, although only 48% had actually taught it.[2]
 


What are controversial issues?

Controversial issues are issues which arouse strong feelings and divide communities.

Issues like these can arise anywhere at any time. They vary from the local to the global – from minarets to climate change. They also vary from place to place, e.g., gay marriage is relatively uncontentious in some countries, but highly controversial in others. Some are long-standing controversies, e.g., the ‘Troubles’ in Northern Ireland, the Israel-Palestine conflict and the ‘Kurdish issue’ in Turkey; while others are more recent, e.g., refugees, violent extremism and transgender issues.

What all these issues have in common is that they are complex, not easily settled by appeal to evidence alone and highly emotive – so much so that people often have difficulty discussing them rationally.
 


Why is it important to address controversial issues at school?

While it might be tempting for schools to try to shy away from issues like these, this is neither beneficial nor practical.

Discussing controversial issues helps students with different backgrounds and lifestyles to learn to live and work together peacefully and respectfully. It encourages them to listen to each other and talk through their differences sensitively. It also challenges them to think critically about their own beliefs and values and gives them confidence and skills to express these publicly.

Talking through difficult issues together develops a number of important democratic competences, e.g., openness to other cultures and beliefs, analytical and critical thinking skills, flexibility and adaptability, and tolerance of ambiguity - all of which lie at the heart of the Council of Europe Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture.

Handled well, it breaks down barriers and helps to defuse social tension between opposing groups, both in school and the wider community.

Exploring controversial issues has educational as well as personal and social benefits. Issues like these help to define some of the major social, political, economic and moral fault-lines in contemporary life and underpin academic learning in many school subjects.

The strongest argument for addressing controversial issues explicitly, however, is that, in practice, they simply cannot be avoided. If teachers do not raise these issues, their students will.
 

Through training in the teaching of controversial issues, I have found the courage to discuss openly with my students issues I thought I would never be able to do, e.g., about sexual abuse and the porn industry.”  Teacher, Iceland


What are the challenges?

The biggest challenge is creating a school ethos in which students genuinely feel they can speak openly about their concerns without fear of vilification or ridicule.

Creating such an ethos requires a whole-school approach. It includes among other things:

  • teachers having the confidence and skills to handle discussion of difficult issues in the classroom, e.g., knowing how to deal with their own prejudices and biases, protect vulnerable individuals and marginalised groups, present issues even-handedly, cope with a lack of expert knowledge, and handle spontaneous or unexpected questions and remarks constructively;
  • school leaders encouraging their staff to take on issues which are controversial and maintaining a consistency of approach across the school, e.g., by providing leadership, professional development, opportunities for team teaching, guidance and support, and risk management;
  • parents and local communities feeling assured that the school is on their side, e.g., being confident the school will not misrepresent or try to undermine their views or culture.
     

How can schools get active?

A good way for schools to begin is by:

  • identifying where controversial issues already feature in the school curriculum and discussing how these are currently handled, e.g., evolution, climate change or animal testing in Science;
  • considering new opportunities for introducing controversial issues into other school subjects and how they might be incorporated into teaching, e.g., the use and abuse of social statistics in Maths;
  • developing ground rules for classroom discussion which guarantee everyone a voice to express their opinion and encourage respect for whoever wishes to speak;
  • creating a small support group to help teachers develop techniques for managing discussion of difficult issues, e.g., how to ‘de-personalise’ an issue by using a story or historical parallel, or helping students to consider alternative perspectives by putting them in other people’s shoes;
  • liaising with students and parents to ensure specific issues are handled fairly and with appropriate methods;
  • introducing more opportunities for discussion in school life and decision-making generally, e.g., in parents’ meetings, staff meetings and pupil parliaments.
     

[1] ‘Free to speak, Safe to learn – Democratic schools for all’ Survey, First Trends, 2018

[2] Cowan & Maitles, ‘Feature or Footnote? Teachers’ attitudes towards the teaching of the Holocaust in primary schools in Scotland’.

Resources on Addressing Controversial Issues

Multimedia

Official texts

Policy documents

Related schools projects

Back Grammar school Slobodan Skerovic

Address: st. Vaka Djurovica bb, Podgorica

Country: Montenegro

 School website


Project: No hate offline, no hate online

Working language during the project:

  • Montenegrin
     

Themes of the Council of Europe campaign “FREE to SPEAK, SAFE to LEARN - Democratic Schools for All” covered:

  • Addressing controversial issues
  • Preventing violence and bullying
  • Tackling discrimination
  • Improving well-being at school
     

Competences from the Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (CDC) addressed and where / how they were integrated:

  • Valuing human dignity and human rights
    Teacher and youth training curriculum based on core human rights’ values and respected both offline and online.
    Workshops and other activities for students are based on core values of human rights, respected equally offline and online
  • Knowledge and critical understanding of the world: politics, law, human rights, culture, cultures, religions, history, media, economies, environment, sustainability
    Every activity within the project is based on creating an environment free from hate speech in which teachers, parents and young people participate in the activities as well as in creating a safe school environment for children and young people, where they learn and acquire essential human rights values
  • Conflict-resolution skills
    In training sessions/peer workshops, students’ learn to recognise and confront violence and hate speech both online and offline using existing mechanisms in the school and the local community;

    Increased awareness and intervention of teachers in cases of hate speech and abuse of children and young people on the Internet
     

Target group age range:

  • 15 - 19
     

Level of education:

  • Lower secondary education
  • Upper secondary education

Short description of the project:

Aims/objectives

Combating hate speech on the Internet means drawing attention to the problem, but also building the capacity of young people and teaching staff to acquire the competences necessary to recognise and act effectively against this kind of human rights violation both online and offline.

Expected results/outcomes

Involving students, parents and teachers, the project was implemented by creating an offline and online platform established in 19 secondary and 4 primary schools in Montenegro:

  • over 25 training sessions were organised for peer educatorsstudents and their mentors-teachers (approximately 25 participants per training)
  • students’ activities included peer workshops, panel discussions and public debates that made a direct impact on approximately 15 000 students and 1 000 teachers
  • research on attitudes and experiences of hate speech in two schools in 2014 and national research in 2018 were both publicly announced and promoted,
  • printed and other material was published and distributed throughout Montenegro,
  • an online and offline media campaign was organised, in which Facebook and Twitter accounts were created and moderated. It was promoted not only in Montenegro, but also in the region and further afield.
     

Changes

  • Creation of an environment in which young people learn and adopt core human rights values
  • Creation of an environment free from hate speech in which teachers, parents and young people take part together in the prevention and intervention
  • Improvement in relations between teachers and students as they work together on problem solving
  • Increased awareness and competences of young people and their teachers to recognise and confront hate speech both online and offline using existing mechanisms
  • Teachers and students given concrete tools for combating hate speech
  • Increased awareness of parents and teachers about the abuse of children online and how to protect them
  • Educational and informational material was produced and serves as a permanent source of knowledge (brochures, leaflets, training material, peer workshops, etc.)
  • Cooperation among secondary schools was fostered
  • Cooperation between secondary schools and other stakeholders (NGOs, media, institutions of the system) is improved
     

Challenges you faced

  • Adopting the activities in a local context (in regard to part of Montenegro). By recognising local problems and focusing on them, it was easier to connect with the problem of hate speech and how to resolve it
  • Lack of motivation of parents to attend organised activities
  • Lack of free time for organising different activities in school: both teachers and students are overwhelmed with the school year curricula
  • Funding the activities: there are not many donors that will fund projects developed by schools/school networks

This project was a new experience for our Volunteers club and we realised that it is very important to carry out similar projects because they provide the opportunity to young people to cooperate with teachers and parents in solving problems. It is also a chance for schools to work closely.
 

Time-frame of the project:

2014-2018
 

Council of Europe materials on citizenship and human rights education used while preparing or implementing your practice:

  • Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture
  • Addressing violence in schools
  • All different – all Equal
  • Compass
  • Bookmarks