Teaching controversial issues raises challenges for both teachers and school directors.


However, being able to discuss sensitive and controversial issues in a respectful way is a vital skill in a democratic culture.

Schools must be places where students feel safe to engage in debates with people who have different opinions. Through the careful management of discussions on controversial issues, schools can promote freedom of expression, as well as inclusion, tolerance, and human rights and prevent, or counter, the use of hate speech by students.

To achieve this, a school action plan on managing controversial issues – which provides staff training – should be adopted as a priority.
 


Facts & Figures

71% of teachers and school leaders surveyed agreed that it is very important that all students in their school express their views openly, even when their views might be controversial.[1]

In response to the question, ‘How valuable is the study of the Holocaust for primary children?’ 88% of teachers viewed Holocaust teaching to be either ‘worthwhile’ or ‘very valuable’ to the primary pupil, although only 48% had actually taught it.[2]
 


What are controversial issues?

Controversial issues are issues which arouse strong feelings and divide communities.

Issues like these can arise anywhere at any time. They vary from the local to the global – from minarets to climate change. They also vary from place to place, e.g., gay marriage is relatively uncontentious in some countries, but highly controversial in others. Some are long-standing controversies, e.g., the ‘Troubles’ in Northern Ireland, the Israel-Palestine conflict and the ‘Kurdish issue’ in Turkey; while others are more recent, e.g., refugees, violent extremism and transgender issues.

What all these issues have in common is that they are complex, not easily settled by appeal to evidence alone and highly emotive – so much so that people often have difficulty discussing them rationally.
 


Why is it important to address controversial issues at school?

While it might be tempting for schools to try to shy away from issues like these, this is neither beneficial nor practical.

Discussing controversial issues helps students with different backgrounds and lifestyles to learn to live and work together peacefully and respectfully. It encourages them to listen to each other and talk through their differences sensitively. It also challenges them to think critically about their own beliefs and values and gives them confidence and skills to express these publicly.

Talking through difficult issues together develops a number of important democratic competences, e.g., openness to other cultures and beliefs, analytical and critical thinking skills, flexibility and adaptability, and tolerance of ambiguity - all of which lie at the heart of the Council of Europe Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture.

Handled well, it breaks down barriers and helps to defuse social tension between opposing groups, both in school and the wider community.

Exploring controversial issues has educational as well as personal and social benefits. Issues like these help to define some of the major social, political, economic and moral fault-lines in contemporary life and underpin academic learning in many school subjects.

The strongest argument for addressing controversial issues explicitly, however, is that, in practice, they simply cannot be avoided. If teachers do not raise these issues, their students will.
 

Through training in the teaching of controversial issues, I have found the courage to discuss openly with my students issues I thought I would never be able to do, e.g., about sexual abuse and the porn industry.”  Teacher, Iceland


What are the challenges?

The biggest challenge is creating a school ethos in which students genuinely feel they can speak openly about their concerns without fear of vilification or ridicule.

Creating such an ethos requires a whole-school approach. It includes among other things:

  • teachers having the confidence and skills to handle discussion of difficult issues in the classroom, e.g., knowing how to deal with their own prejudices and biases, protect vulnerable individuals and marginalised groups, present issues even-handedly, cope with a lack of expert knowledge, and handle spontaneous or unexpected questions and remarks constructively;
  • school leaders encouraging their staff to take on issues which are controversial and maintaining a consistency of approach across the school, e.g., by providing leadership, professional development, opportunities for team teaching, guidance and support, and risk management;
  • parents and local communities feeling assured that the school is on their side, e.g., being confident the school will not misrepresent or try to undermine their views or culture.
     

How can schools get active?

A good way for schools to begin is by:

  • identifying where controversial issues already feature in the school curriculum and discussing how these are currently handled, e.g., evolution, climate change or animal testing in Science;
  • considering new opportunities for introducing controversial issues into other school subjects and how they might be incorporated into teaching, e.g., the use and abuse of social statistics in Maths;
  • developing ground rules for classroom discussion which guarantee everyone a voice to express their opinion and encourage respect for whoever wishes to speak;
  • creating a small support group to help teachers develop techniques for managing discussion of difficult issues, e.g., how to ‘de-personalise’ an issue by using a story or historical parallel, or helping students to consider alternative perspectives by putting them in other people’s shoes;
  • liaising with students and parents to ensure specific issues are handled fairly and with appropriate methods;
  • introducing more opportunities for discussion in school life and decision-making generally, e.g., in parents’ meetings, staff meetings and pupil parliaments.
     

[1] ‘Free to speak, Safe to learn – Democratic schools for all’ Survey, First Trends, 2018

[2] Cowan & Maitles, ‘Feature or Footnote? Teachers’ attitudes towards the teaching of the Holocaust in primary schools in Scotland’.

Resources on Addressing Controversial Issues

Multimedia

Official texts

Policy documents

Related schools projects

Back Vilnius Kachialov Gymnasium

Address: 1 A.J.Povilaicio, Vilnius

Country: Lithuania

 School website


Project: Big Small Screens: Media Literacy in Schools of Lithuania

Working language during the project:

  • Lithuanian, English, Russian
     

Themes of the Council of Europe campaign “FREE to SPEAK, SAFE to LEARN - Democratic Schools for All” covered:

  • Making children’s and students’ voices heard
  • Addressing controversial issues
  • Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news
     

Competences from the Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (CDC) addressed and where / how they were integrated:

  • Analytical and critical thinking skills
    While studying and watching audio visual media products students are encouraged to analyse them critically from different perspectives and points of view, so that they were able to understand how media is constructed and recognise manipulation.
  • Knowledge and critical understanding of language and communication
    Students compare and contrast audio visual language, its symbols, signs, and expressiveness with the texts. They learn about audio visual ways of communicating information, levels of formality.
  • Co-operation skills
    Creating video games or documentaries, organising Media Week for the community, students get social experience while co-operating and solving problems as well as teamwork experience with sharing responsibilities.
     

Target group age range:

  • 15 - 19

Level of education:

  • Upper secondary education

Short description of the project:

Aims/objectives

The project aims to develop media literacy skills (with a special focus on audio visual media) amongst students and teachers of secondary and higher education, especially targeting the areas that are largely populated by ethnic minorities in Lithuania. The students learn how audio-visual media (cinema, computer games, social networks, TV and advertisement) is constructed and try to create it with the help of professionals.
 

Expected results/outcomes

As a result of the project we expected the students:

  • to be able to analyse and understand how different types of media (cinema, television, advertisement, social networks, video games) are constructed and used to achieve different purposes
  • to be aware of how to recognise fake news, propaganda and misinformation in media
  • to involve the whole school community during the Media Festival in debates, the top-speaker tournament, brain-rings, exhibition of media vocabulary posters, selfie contests and other attractive activities
  • to create and present their own audio visual media product (a computer game or a short documentary) with the help of professionals.
     

Changes

Impact of the project on students:

  • The ability to critically analyse and understand various media products to recognise propaganda and fake news as well as avoid being manipulated.
  • Meeting students’ interests practical activities which result in creating a final product
  • Teamwork experience with sharing responsibilities
  • Social experience while cooperating and solving problems
  • Meeting and working with high-level media industry specialists
  • Experience in terms of future career prospects

Impact on teachers:

  • New knowledge, practical experience and teaching materials about five spheres of media and their impact on teenagers, which can be used to discuss the problems of propaganda, fake news and misinformation.
  • Meeting with and support from media industry specialists

Impact on schools as educational institutions:

  • Development of the teachers’ qualifications to tackle controversial political issues through practical activities with students
  • Non-traditional activities, such as workshops, computer game testing, excursions, meeting celebrities
  • The whole community involvement into the activities
  • Partnership with other schools and organisations
  • Highly motivated students and teachers
     

Challenges you faced

The first problem is the lack of qualified specialists at the school to deal with the topic of audio visual media, dealing with misinformation and propaganda. Although the teachers were given very effective practical training and support from the organizers, the preparation for the lessons and activities required a lot of personal effort and time.

Teenagers are usually not politically concerned, and if they are, they are influenced by their families very much. Therefore, discussing political issues is often faced with tension. We have found an indirect way to deal with it through learning about media.

Teachers often feel unconfident and inexperienced to work on the issue of audio visual media, like video games or social networks, as they are mostly of the older generation. It was therefore not easy to build a team of teachers at school for the project.
 

Time-frame of the project:

One school year