Propaganda, misinformation and fake news have the potential to polarise public opinion, to promote violent extremism and hate speech and, ultimately, to undermine democracies and reduce trust in the democratic processes.


It is vital for schools to provide students with a solid education on media and information literacy as part of the curriculum.

Teachers must be well-trained in the subject to empower students with the necessary competences to critically understand and assess information reported by all forms of media.

Projects in partnership with national and local authorities and media organisations are encouraged.
 


Facts & figures

Two thirds of EU citizens report coming across fake news at least once a week.[1]

Over 80% of EU citizens say they see fake news both as an issue for their country and for democracy in general.[2]

Half of EU citizens aged 15-30 say they need critical thinking and information skills to help them combat fake news and extremism in society.[3]


What is propaganda, misinformation and fake news?

The terms ‘propaganda’, ‘misinformation’ and ‘fake news’ often overlap in meaning. They are used to refer to a range of ways in which sharing information causes harm, intentionally or unintentionally – usually in relation to the promotion of a particular moral or political cause or point of view.

It is possible to separate out three clearly different uses of information which fall into this category:

  • Mis-information - false information shared with no intention of causing harm
  • Dis-information - false information shared intentionally to cause harm
  • Mal-information - true information shared intentionally to cause harm.[4]

Although none of these phenomena are new, they have taken on new significance recently with the widespread availability of sophisticated forms of information and communication technology. The sharing of text, images, videos, or links online, for example, allows information to go viral within hours.


Why is propaganda, misinformation and fake news important at school?

Since information and communication technology is so central to their lives nowadays, young people are particularly vulnerable to propaganda, misinformation and fake news. Young people spend a significant amount of their time watching television, playing online games, chatting, blogging, listening to music, posting photos of themselves and searching for other people with whom to communicate online. They rely heavily on information circulated online for their knowledge of the world and how they perceive reality. Many parents do not have sufficient technical competence to keep up with their children’s online activity, or educate them about the risks they might be facing. Schools, therefore, have a duty to provide young people with the critical and information skills which they cannot access at home.
 

“The significant rise of fake news as propaganda in recent years makes it critical that students have the skills they need to identify truth and discern bias.”[5]

The ability to respond critically to online propaganda, misinformation and fake news is more than a safe-guarding tool, however, it is also an important democratic competence in its own right. Analytical and critical thinking, and knowledge and critical understanding of the world, including the role of language and communication lie at the heart of the Council of Europe Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture. They are central to Digital Citizenship Education and Media and Information Literacy.[6]
 

“School is the one place where it is absolutely crucial to train future citizens to understand, to criticise and to create information. It is in schools that the digital citizen must begin and maintain constant critical thinking in order to attain meaningful participation in his or her community.”[7]

The ability to handle off-line as well as online propaganda, misinformation and fake news is also a key skill in a number of other school subjects, e.g., History, Social Studies, Science, Religious Studies and Art. Young people may study the use of nationalistic and patriotic slogans, or so-called ‘atrocity propaganda’ in WW1 in History, for example; or art forms designed to support particular ideologies in Art lessons.

Another area in which information and communication technology is becoming an issue for schools is through adverse comments made about teachers and schools on social media. Schools are finding that parents and others increasingly turn to social media when they have a dispute or disagreement with their school, e.g., over school rules, school policies, or staff behaviour. How to handle online critical or defamatory comments or campaigns of this sort has become a matter of concern for leaders and managers in some schools.[8]


What are the challenges?

There are a number of challenges facing schools wishing to take propaganda, misinformation and fake news seriously as an educational or social issue:

  • Teachers’ own online activity and area of experience is often quite limited and frequently lags behind that of their students. This can make them reticent to take on this area of teaching and learning without a significant commitment to professional development.
  • The speed with which technology and young peoples’ online activity changes makes it difficult for teachers to keep up-to-date with recent developments. Even professional development programmes can go rapidly out-of-date.
  • It can be difficult finding a discrete slot in the school timetable where issues relating to the creation and sharing of information can be taught. While aspects may be raised in a number of subjects, it can be a problem finding a space in an over-full curriculum where the phenomenon can be dealt with head-on as an issue in its own right.
  • The description ‘fake news’ does not mean there is such a category as ‘true’ news. All news is a selection and written to suit a particular audience for a particular purpose. Providing the depth of analysis and sophisticated skills that do justice to this topic can be a challenge for some schools, especially in terms of teacher competence and training.
     

“States should take measures to promote media and digital literacy, including by covering these topics as part of the regular school curriculum and by engaging with civil society and other stakeholders to raise awareness about these issues.”[9]


How can schools get active?

Providing training for teachers on media and information literacy is the key to raising the profile of the issue in schools. Even though it may have a tendency to date, training can at least alert teaching staff to the importance of this area of learning for their students. The more important teachers see the area, the more they will feel the need to continuously up-date their skills themselves.

While it is important to recruit as many teachers as possible to this work, it can be more effective in the long run to start by appointing an individual teacher, or a small team, to lead on media and information literacy in the school. This element of specialist expertise can be charged with:

  • Keeping staff up to date with new developments in information and communication technology
  • Training them in strategies for handling propaganda, misinformation and fake news
  • Helping them integrate these issues into the curriculum of different subjects
  • Leading on school-policy development and action planning in this area.

In addition to these sorts of developments, there are a number of other initiatives a school can take to meet the challenges of the rapidly changing world of online propaganda, misinformation and fake news. These include:

  • Special days or events in school on the subject of propaganda, misinformation or fake news as a way of overcoming the problems of an over-crowded formal curriculum
  • Peer education initiatives in which older students instruct and counsel younger students in the safe handling of information they access in the media
  • Partnerships with outside professionals or companies with expertise in this area, e.g., journalists, IT companies, universities
  • Virtual links with schools in other regions or countries enabling students to get a different perspective on news and current affairs
  • Recruiting parents with expertise in information and communication technology to help with school policy development or work alongside teaching staff to enrich student learning.

 

[1] Flash Eurobarometer 464 , 2018

[2] Ibid.

[3] Flash Eurobarometer 455, 2018

[4] Wardle & Derakhshan, H., 2017. Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.

[5] When is fake news propaganda?, Facing History and Ourselves, 2018

[6] Digital Citizenship Education Handbook, 2019

[7] Ibid.

[8] Council of Europe: Managing Controversy: a whole school training tool, 2017

[9] OSCE: Joint declaration on freedom of expression and “fake news”, disinformation and propaganda

  Resources on Dealing with Propaganda, misinformation and fake news

Multimedia

Official texts

Policy documents

Studies

Tools

Related schools projects

Back Kuben upper secondary school

Address: Kuben videregående skole (Kuben upper secondary school)

Country: Norway

 School website


Project: Democratic preparedness towards racism and discrimination

 

Working language during the project:

  • Norwegian 
  • English
     

Themes of the Council of Europe campaign “FREE to SPEAK, SAFE to LEARN - Democratic Schools for All” covered:

  • Making children’s and students’ voices heard
  • Addressing controversial issues
  • Preventing violence and bullying
  • Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news
  • Tackling discrimination
  • Improving well-being at school
     

Competences from the Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (CDC) addressed and where / how they were integrated:

  • Valuing democracy, justice, fairness, equality and the rule of law
    The values are the framework, and the basis of what we do. We expect our students to know, live by and follow through on these values.
  • Analytical and critical thinking skills
    This is an important part of being a student, are integrated in different educational situations, and include skills such as writing papers with support from different sources, and the ability to uncover conspiracy theories. They are expected to present solutions on complex matters. 
  • Conflict-resolution skills
    We have used conflict management/non-violent communications as a method for years, and educate peer mediators among the students.
     

Target group age range:

  • 15-19
     

Level of education:

  • Upper secondary education

Short description of the project:

Kuben Upper Secondary School (Kuben for short) is Oslo's largest school with about 1800 students (school years 11-13/ age 16 to 19). Kuben offers both vocational training (2-4 years) as well as general academic studies (three years). We have a very diverse student community.

Kuben participated in DEMBRA (Democratic Preparedness Against Racism and Anti-Semitism, a national program) in the school year 2018-2019. It provided us with the opportunity to work professionally and systematically with the attitudes of both students and employees in order to prevent exclusion and extremism.

Kuben seeks to develop methods for building relationships and a healthy learning environment. Our ambition is to include students, teachers and the school management, systematically using measures that combine instruction, activities that foster a harmonious and secure environment, and the use of conflict management/non-violent communications. This requires a continual focus on strengthening the social and emotional competences of both students and adults.

The students in our political science classes have been working on projects that seek to increase their awareness and understanding of voluntary or forced social exclusion. Learning from their own and other youths’ experiences of living in a diverse community, our students work on how to promote involvement and inclusion, exchange ideas and opinions, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of our local communities and democratic society, and counteract and prevent isolation, racism and conflict.

Kuben Upper Secondary School has recently been awarded the national award the Benjamin Prize (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Prize) for its long-term and systematic work against racism and discrimination.

 

Aims/objectives

Our ambition is to develop Kuben's educational programme and increase efforts to counteract voluntary or forced social exclusion among our students and in the wider community, and at the same time focus on inclusion, citizenship and democratic preparedness. We are still developing our work throughout the school. 

Kuben would also like to develop an international network of schools to exchange ideas and experiences, and we want to expand our work and add a European dimension. Therefore, we are looking for suitable partners to join us in a project proposal for Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership KA201, Call 2020, with 2-3 compatible schools as partners. We will also seek to involve associate partners such as The Norwegian Center for Holocaust and Minority Studies. We have several ideas on activities and participants, and would like to develop these in collaboration with potential partners. The deadline for the application is March 2020.

 

Expected results/outcomes

We would like to create both real life and virtual collaboration spaces to encourage intercultural learning between Kuben-students and youth from other countries. We also seek to learn more on how to develop, organise and implement new educational programmes and methods on these issues in our school community.

 

Changes

The students have a greater awareness on the issues, a larger engagement on these questions and we experience that the values and the mindset is an important part of the whole organisation. We also have peer mediators among the students that help us handle difficult questions and situations in the student community. We have seen that the trained student mediators bring their knowledge with them into their local communities and help solve local conflicts amongst their peers. 

 

Challenges you faced

The students only attend our school for three years on average, and we have new groups and students every year. Inclusion and creating a good, democratic environment are continuous work, and we never sit back and relax. In a world where we experience increasing polarisation, a large pressure on democratic values and a constant questioning of truths and facts through fake news and revisionists, we must educate students with strong democratic values and teach and encourage critical thinking.

 

Time-frame of the project:

The Erasmus+ KA201 lasts for three years.

Note that at Kuben we want democratic practices to be a part of our framework, and not just a time-specified project.

 

Council of Europe materials on citizenship and human rights education used while preparing or implementing your practice: