Propaganda, misinformation and fake news have the potential to polarise public opinion, to promote violent extremism and hate speech and, ultimately, to undermine democracies and reduce trust in the democratic processes.


It is vital for schools to provide students with a solid education on media and information literacy as part of the curriculum.

Teachers must be well-trained in the subject to empower students with the necessary competences to critically understand and assess information reported by all forms of media.

Projects in partnership with national and local authorities and media organisations are encouraged.
 


Facts & figures

Two thirds of EU citizens report coming across fake news at least once a week.[1]

Over 80% of EU citizens say they see fake news both as an issue for their country and for democracy in general.[2]

Half of EU citizens aged 15-30 say they need critical thinking and information skills to help them combat fake news and extremism in society.[3]


What is propaganda, misinformation and fake news?

The terms ‘propaganda’, ‘misinformation’ and ‘fake news’ often overlap in meaning. They are used to refer to a range of ways in which sharing information causes harm, intentionally or unintentionally – usually in relation to the promotion of a particular moral or political cause or point of view.

It is possible to separate out three clearly different uses of information which fall into this category:

  • Mis-information - false information shared with no intention of causing harm
  • Dis-information - false information shared intentionally to cause harm
  • Mal-information - true information shared intentionally to cause harm.[4]

Although none of these phenomena are new, they have taken on new significance recently with the widespread availability of sophisticated forms of information and communication technology. The sharing of text, images, videos, or links online, for example, allows information to go viral within hours.


Why is propaganda, misinformation and fake news important at school?

Since information and communication technology is so central to their lives nowadays, young people are particularly vulnerable to propaganda, misinformation and fake news. Young people spend a significant amount of their time watching television, playing online games, chatting, blogging, listening to music, posting photos of themselves and searching for other people with whom to communicate online. They rely heavily on information circulated online for their knowledge of the world and how they perceive reality. Many parents do not have sufficient technical competence to keep up with their children’s online activity, or educate them about the risks they might be facing. Schools, therefore, have a duty to provide young people with the critical and information skills which they cannot access at home.
 

“The significant rise of fake news as propaganda in recent years makes it critical that students have the skills they need to identify truth and discern bias.”[5]

The ability to respond critically to online propaganda, misinformation and fake news is more than a safe-guarding tool, however, it is also an important democratic competence in its own right. Analytical and critical thinking, and knowledge and critical understanding of the world, including the role of language and communication lie at the heart of the Council of Europe Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture. They are central to Digital Citizenship Education and Media and Information Literacy.[6]
 

“School is the one place where it is absolutely crucial to train future citizens to understand, to criticise and to create information. It is in schools that the digital citizen must begin and maintain constant critical thinking in order to attain meaningful participation in his or her community.”[7]

The ability to handle off-line as well as online propaganda, misinformation and fake news is also a key skill in a number of other school subjects, e.g., History, Social Studies, Science, Religious Studies and Art. Young people may study the use of nationalistic and patriotic slogans, or so-called ‘atrocity propaganda’ in WW1 in History, for example; or art forms designed to support particular ideologies in Art lessons.

Another area in which information and communication technology is becoming an issue for schools is through adverse comments made about teachers and schools on social media. Schools are finding that parents and others increasingly turn to social media when they have a dispute or disagreement with their school, e.g., over school rules, school policies, or staff behaviour. How to handle online critical or defamatory comments or campaigns of this sort has become a matter of concern for leaders and managers in some schools.[8]


What are the challenges?

There are a number of challenges facing schools wishing to take propaganda, misinformation and fake news seriously as an educational or social issue:

  • Teachers’ own online activity and area of experience is often quite limited and frequently lags behind that of their students. This can make them reticent to take on this area of teaching and learning without a significant commitment to professional development.
  • The speed with which technology and young peoples’ online activity changes makes it difficult for teachers to keep up-to-date with recent developments. Even professional development programmes can go rapidly out-of-date.
  • It can be difficult finding a discrete slot in the school timetable where issues relating to the creation and sharing of information can be taught. While aspects may be raised in a number of subjects, it can be a problem finding a space in an over-full curriculum where the phenomenon can be dealt with head-on as an issue in its own right.
  • The description ‘fake news’ does not mean there is such a category as ‘true’ news. All news is a selection and written to suit a particular audience for a particular purpose. Providing the depth of analysis and sophisticated skills that do justice to this topic can be a challenge for some schools, especially in terms of teacher competence and training.
     

“States should take measures to promote media and digital literacy, including by covering these topics as part of the regular school curriculum and by engaging with civil society and other stakeholders to raise awareness about these issues.”[9]


How can schools get active?

Providing training for teachers on media and information literacy is the key to raising the profile of the issue in schools. Even though it may have a tendency to date, training can at least alert teaching staff to the importance of this area of learning for their students. The more important teachers see the area, the more they will feel the need to continuously up-date their skills themselves.

While it is important to recruit as many teachers as possible to this work, it can be more effective in the long run to start by appointing an individual teacher, or a small team, to lead on media and information literacy in the school. This element of specialist expertise can be charged with:

  • Keeping staff up to date with new developments in information and communication technology
  • Training them in strategies for handling propaganda, misinformation and fake news
  • Helping them integrate these issues into the curriculum of different subjects
  • Leading on school-policy development and action planning in this area.

In addition to these sorts of developments, there are a number of other initiatives a school can take to meet the challenges of the rapidly changing world of online propaganda, misinformation and fake news. These include:

  • Special days or events in school on the subject of propaganda, misinformation or fake news as a way of overcoming the problems of an over-crowded formal curriculum
  • Peer education initiatives in which older students instruct and counsel younger students in the safe handling of information they access in the media
  • Partnerships with outside professionals or companies with expertise in this area, e.g., journalists, IT companies, universities
  • Virtual links with schools in other regions or countries enabling students to get a different perspective on news and current affairs
  • Recruiting parents with expertise in information and communication technology to help with school policy development or work alongside teaching staff to enrich student learning.

 

[1] Flash Eurobarometer 464 , 2018

[2] Ibid.

[3] Flash Eurobarometer 455, 2018

[4] Wardle & Derakhshan, H., 2017. Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.

[5] When is fake news propaganda?, Facing History and Ourselves, 2018

[6] Digital Citizenship Education Handbook, 2019

[7] Ibid.

[8] Council of Europe: Managing Controversy: a whole school training tool, 2017

[9] OSCE: Joint declaration on freedom of expression and “fake news”, disinformation and propaganda

  Resources on Dealing with Propaganda, misinformation and fake news

Multimedia

Official texts

Policy documents

Studies

Tools

Related schools projects

Back Sachkhere Public School #3

Address: #19 V.Nozadze Str.

Country: Georgia

 School website


Project: Summer camp ,, Education for Democracy”

 

Working language during the project: 

  • Georgian
     

Themes of the Council of Europe campaign “FREE to SPEAK, SAFE to LEARN - Democratic Schools for All” covered:

  • Making children’s and students’ voices heard
  • Preventing violence and bullying
  • Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news
  • Tackling discrimination
     

Competences from the Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (CDC) addressed and where / how they were integrated:

  • Valuing human dignity and human rights
    First day activity: Making Human rights poster using old magazines.
    Game: ”Lost Rights”, students have half a part of a human right and have to find the other part.
  • Analytical and critical thinking skills
    Conflict- resolution skills

    During school students had discussions, debates and presentations about different topics: conflict, bullying, stereotypes and democracy.
  • Openness to cultural otherness and to other beliefs, world views and practices
    During summer school, trainers used role play, watching short videos, making posters and videos about equality
     

Target group age range:

  • 15-19
     

Level of education:

  • Upper secondary education

Short description of the project:

The summer school lasted for five days, during which participants discussed with their trainers topics such as: Human Rights, Stereotypes and prejudices, Equality, Conflict and Bulling and Democracy – achievements and challenges. Participants also discussed the strategies of effective communication during conflict situations and planned action projects to create a democratic culture in their schools.

25 participants were students who came from Sachkhereand tried to resolve the issues critical for their schools and communities, they led civic-minded projects and participated in initiatives together with their peers. In daily trainings they learnt how to think critically, how to plan the initiatives and projects, how to become more active in the decision-making process, how to become more sociable with the help of group work, presentations, simulations and role play.

A camp helped students to learn more about civic activism and planning and implementing civic initiatives. The trainings conducted in the camp helped students to improve their presentation and communication skills and to learn how to advocate for themselves and their communities. School also offered activities for fun and leisure. Day leaders, who were former students, assisted the trainers.

 

Aims/objectives

  • To create a “Civic Culture of Learning” in our school, where teachers and all staff lead a joint effort to study, discuss, and enact educational policies.
  • To improve civility school wide, civic norms, heightened participation in extra-curriculars, connections to outside class civic activities, etc.
  • To get students excited about deepening and extending their own personal set of core values, beliefs and principles on important issues of justice, ethics, and morality.
  • To help students develop their unique civic identities and to apply their personal principles and beliefs on civic duty in solving social and political problems locally, nationally, and internationally.

 

Expected results/outcomes

As the result of project 25 students

  • Learnt to become responsible citizens not only through study in the classroom, but also through being given the opportunity to learn from experience.
  • Understood how stereotypes and prejudices are linked and how they may lead to unfair views of individuals, groups of people and whole countries.
  • Learnt to recognise and analyse situations where human rights are in conflict and developed critical thinking about the acceptability of the use of violence and about personal behaviour.
  • Learnt to express their own opinions on a topic and offer justifications for these views
  • Planned 4 projects to support the establishment of a democratic culture in their schools.
  • Filmed 4 videos on democratic values and made thematical posters.

 

Changes

  • According students feedback we were changing the agenda

 

Challenges you faced

  • At the very beginning students were confused and had difficulties to express their opinions honestly. Some of them tried not to be active during discussions and presentations.

 

Time-frame of the project:

The duration of project was 3 weeks, comprising a 2-week planning period (1-14 July) and 5-day implemention period (15 July to 20 July). 

 

Council of Europe materials on citizenship and human rights education used while preparing or implementing your practice:

  • Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture
  • Living Democracy - manuals for teachers
  • Compasito