Navigation
Skip to Content
WWW.COE.INT
Human Rights
Democracy
Rule of Law
About us
Council of Europe at a glance
The Council of Europe: key facts
Achievements and History
Jobs and Traineeships
Home
Human Rights
Democracy
Rule of Law
Administrative entities
Secretary General
Deputy Secretary General
Chairmanship
Committee of Ministers
Parliamentary Assembly
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities
European Court of Human Rights
Commissioner for Human Rights
Conference of INGOs
Monitoring bodies
Private Office
Treaty Office
46 Member States
Theme files
Newsroom
Events
Bookshop
Online resources
Contact
Intranet
English
Choose language
English
Français
Connect
Search
Council of Europe at a glance
The Council of Europe: key facts
Achievements and History
Jobs and Traineeships
Home
Human Rights
Democracy
Rule of Law
Administrative entities
Secretary General
Deputy Secretary General
Chairmanship
Committee of Ministers
Parliamentary Assembly
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities
European Court of Human Rights
Commissioner for Human Rights
Conference of INGOs
Monitoring bodies
Private Office
Treaty Office
46 Member States
Theme files
Newsroom
Events
Bookshop
Online resources
Contact
Intranet
Avenue de l'Europe
F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex
Tel. +33 (0)3 88 41 20 00
www.coe.int
Cybercrime
Homepage
Budapest Convention
Back
First Additional Protocol
Back
International conference on xenophobia and racism committed through computer systems
[PDF] Good practice study: Implementing the First Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on Xenophobia and Racism
Second Additional Protocol
Back
Opening for signature of the Second additional Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention
Back
Resources: Opening for signature SAP and International Conference
T-CY Committee
Back
T-CY Plenaries
T-CY Reports
Protocol negotiations
Back
Protocol Consultations
Octopus Conference
Back
Octopus Conference 2023
Capacity Building
Back
Octopus Project
GLACY-e
Back
GLACY-e Activities
International Network of National Judicial Trainers
P2P Webinars -International Network of National Judicial Trainers
GLACY-e Testimonials and Good Cyberstories
Back
GLACY-e Testimonials
Good Cyberstories
CyberEast+
Back
CyberEast+ Activities
CyberEast+ Documentation
CyberEast+ Legislation and Policy
CyberSouth+
CyberSPEX
CyberSEE
C-PROC
Resources
Back
Reports
Webinars
Cybercrime and COVID-19
Cyberviolence resource
Octopus Platform
Ransomware
Newsletters
You are here:
Cybercrime
Capacity Building
Octopus Project Workshops
Octopus project Activities - Workshops
Suggestions
Your input is valuable to us. Please send us your suggestions.
0. Name and email address (optional)
This field is mandatory.
1.Which workshop did you attend?
Trinidad and Tobago
Barbados
Montserrat
Saint Lucia
Suriname
Guyana
Jamaica
This field is mandatory.
2. What is your overall satisfaction rating of this program?
Fully satisfied
Satisfied
Not satisfied at all
This field is mandatory.
3. How helpful was the workshop for you?
Extremely helpful
Very helpful
Somewhat helpful
Not so helpful
Not at all helpful
a. How did you feel about the length of the program?
Too long
Just right
Too short
b. How did you feel about the pacing of the program?
Too fast
Just right
Too slow
This field is mandatory.
c. Did you find the workshop:
Mainly practical
Mainly theoretical
Balanced
This field is mandatory.
a. The session delivered the information I expected to receive
Fully satisfied
Satisfied
Not satisfied at all
This field is mandatory.
b. I gained new information/knowledge and I plan to use it in my work
Agree
Somewhat agree
Disagree
This field is mandatory.
c. The topics were presented effectively
Agree
Somewhat agree
Disagree
This field is mandatory.
a. How did you find the interactions between facilitator(s) and delegates?
Excellent
Good
Average
Insufficient
This field is mandatory.
b. How do you rate the competencies of the facilitators(s)?
Excellent
Good
Average
Insufficient
This field is mandatory.
c. How do you rate the answers given to your questions?
Excellent
Good
Average
Insufficient
This field is mandatory.
d. What are your views on materials shared prior to the workshop?
Excellent
Good
Average
Insufficient
Not applicable
7. Which benefits could you draw from this workshop?
8. Recommendations - what could be improved? Other suggestions
This field is mandatory.
9. To what extent would you recommend others similar workshops?
6 - Fully
5
4
3
2
1 - Not at all
Send
Hidden