What is Democratic Security? How does Democratic Security interact with democracy, human rights and the rule of law? How can the Council of Europe help to foster the capacity of its member states to guarantee security for their citizens through their commitment to democratic norms?

This new series of Debates aims to examine current thinking and dynamics behind the concept of Democratic Security, identify main elements and threats and explore how Democratic Security can strengthen, through different mechanisms related to democracy, human rights and rule of law, peace and stability in Europe.

Co-organised by the Council of Europe and the Ecole Nationale d'Administration (ENA), the debates on democratic security feature eminent personalities from politics, civil society and the academic world. Each time, speakers address in a different way the complexity of issues related to Democratic Security.

 Read concept paper

all democratic security debates

Back Peter Neumann: 'Radicalisation and disengagement: Myths and Reality'

Thirteenth Debate
Peter Neumann: 'Radicalisation and disengagement: Myths and Reality'

In his exposé, Peter Neumann addressed the five myths he believes need to be investigated in order to better assess the issue of radicalisation and disengagement : “The first stipulates that people radicalise into terrorism because of one given factor. The second claims that most jihadists are actually from the middle class. The third myth is that the internet causes people to join Daesch. The fourth holds that Islam is the root cause of jihadist terror or, alternatively, that Islam has nothing at all to do with jihadist terrorism. The fifth suggests that deradicalisation and disengagement either always work or never work.”

For Peter Neumann, “there is no single factor or explanation for why and how people become violent extremists, but there are core elements and patterns that allow us to make sense of the process. He highlights in particular “grievances, ideologies, emotional needs and social processes and explains that “in contrast to previous generations, European jihadists today include many individuals with criminal pasts or people from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. The internet certainly plays a role in radicalisation; but it is rarely the sole explanation or driver for extremism. Although Salafi jihadists [..] can be located on the spectrum of Islam, they do not represent Islam. And finally, deradicalisation and disengagement are complex processes; they do not always work, but if they are done systematically and professionally, they can be useful tools in facilitating the exit from violent extremism.”


  Watch the video of the debate.

Strasbourg 17 October 2017
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page
Resources

   Concept paper

   ENA web site

 All debates on democratic security

  Publications