Vukota-Bojić v. Switzerland | 2017

Protection against the abuse of secret surveillance in insurance disputes

...given the overall lack of clarity of domestic law provisions on the matter, the Court is not satisfied that they were sufficient to constitute adequate and effective guarantees against abuse.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, January 2017

Background

In 1995, Savjeta Vukota-Bojić suffered injuries to her head and spine when she was hit by a motorcycle.

Doctors had different opinions about whether she would be able to work again.

Before the accident, Savjeta had been a hairdresser. Like all working people in Switzerland, she had compulsory accident cover. But Savjeta’s insurance company (a public body) wanted her to have further tests. Medical examiners found that she was fully able to work.

There followed a legal dispute between Savjeta and the insurance company lasting many years, leading to court dates and yet more medical tests.

During the dispute, the company hired private detectives to secretly follow Savjeta after she refused to undergo a test. A report was compiled about her activities. The company initially denied Savjeta benefits, partly because of what was written in the report.

Savjeta felt violated when she learned about the secret filming. She wanted compensation and for the surveillance case file to be destroyed.

In 2010, a Swiss court ruled that the surveillance had been lawful, and the file was valid evidence.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that Switzerland breached Savjeta’s right to privacy because Swiss law did not include sufficient safeguards against the abuse of secret surveillance measures.

Follow-up

In response to the European court’s judgment, Switzerland brought in a new law in 2019 better regulating secret surveillance activities on behalf of insurance companies.

The new law includes a list of circumstances which justify surveillance, a list of methods that are subject to court approval, the maximum period of time involved, an obligation to tell the person concerned that they have been monitored and general rules for the storage and destruction of data collected.

Additional information

Themes:

Related examples

Greater protection of privacy after a civil servant was spied on to pass NATO security clearance

Gracinda Maria Antunes Rocha would never have started her new job had she known that she would be placed under surveillance to get security clearance. The European Court of Human Rights found that the Portuguese authorities had breached her right to privacy. Portugal responded to the judgment by bringing in a new law allowing victims to get justice more easily in such circumstances.

Themes: Right to privacy

Portugal

Privacy laws strengthened after a lawyer’s phone calls were intercepted

The authorities tapped the telephone of lawyer Hans Kopp and listened to confidential conversations. The Strasbourg court ruled that Swiss law had not properly limited the interception of confidential communications by the authorities. This violated Mr Kopp’s right to respect for privacy, leading to stronger legal protections.