Jeličić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina  | 2006

Reforms after bank refused to pay out pensioner’s savings

This is horrible. I do not even know how I am able to talk to you. I'm constantly medicated. I’m up to my neck in debt. My foreign currency savings account has been blocked and since then I am not employed, I do not receive my pension and my husband has died.

Ruža Jeličić, as reported by Radio Free Liberty

Background

Ruža Jeličić was a citizen of the former Yugoslavia. In the 1970s and 80s she lived and worked in Germany, in order to save money. She deposited her savings of German marks in a bank account in her home country.

Mrs Jeličić returned home to live off the money that she had earnt. However, in the late 1980s the former Yugoslavia experienced a financial crisis. With the banking system on the verge of collapse, a law was passed banning individuals from withdrawing money from accounts containing foreign currency. Along with thousands of others, Mrs Jeličić was banned from accessing her savings.

According to Mrs Jeličić, the loss of her money left her without sufficient financial support. Her husband died and she no longer worked, but she had no pension after her foreign currency savings were blocked.

In 1998 the courts ordered that the bank would have to pay Mrs Jeličić her money. However, the bank refused to comply with the court order and the authorities refused to enforce it. The money later became a public debt, but the authorities still refused to pay it back.  

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court found that the national courts of Bosnia and Herzegovina had ordered the money to be paid back to Mrs Jeličić – yet the authorities had still refused to pay. The authorities’ refusal to comply had violated Mrs Jeličić’s right to have judgments properly enforced, and breached her right to property.

Follow-up

In July 2007 Mrs Jeličić was paid back all of her lost savings.

The authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina introduced a series of measures to help people get back their old foreign currency savings when this has been ordered by a national court.

The law which had previously prevented the enforcement of court decisions about old foreign currency savings was abolished. The authorities also introduced an action plan to make sure that all past court decisions were enforced and that the necessary funds were available for payment.

By 2012, old foreign currency savings had been repaid in the vast majority of those cases where the authorities had been made aware of a judgment ordering a repayment.

Themes:

Related examples

Widow wins fight for husband’s property confiscated by the police

When Karol Rummi’s husband died, his valuable possessions were arbitrarily confiscated by the police. When Mrs Rummi tried to get them back, she was not allowed to make her case in court and told that the property now belonged to the state. The European court ruled that her right to property had been breached. She was compensated and the law was changed to prevent similar problems happening again.

Read more

98 year-old wins decades-long fight for property seized by the Communist regime

After the fall of communism in Romania, laws were passed giving people the right to claim back property nationalised by the old regime. Tens of thousands of people made such claims, but a huge number faced delays and failures to deal with their applications. The European court ruled that the system must be reformed – leading to a new law which made the restitution system more effective.

Read more

Unfair trial leads to reforms to protect justice

César Igual Coll was cleared of failing to pay family maintenance, because he was unemployed and had no money. However, his case went to appeal. The appeal court held no public hearing and no evidence was taken from him. Nevertheless, César was convicted and sentenced to jail. The European court ruled that he had been denied a fair hearing. Changes were made to protect fair trials in Spain.

Read more