Ciubotaru v. Republic of Moldova  | 2010

Reforms made to unreasonable government control of registered ethnicity

Background

During the Soviet period, most people in Moldova were systematically registered as having Moldovan ethnicity.

Mihai Ciubotaru is a writer and a professor of French. He lived in Chisinau. His parents were born in an area which was then part of Romania. However, it later became part of the Soviet Union, and is now in present-day Moldova. Mihai and his parents had all been registered by the Soviet authorities as ethnically Moldovan.

In 2002 Mihai applied to have his identity changed from Moldovan to Romanian. His request was rejected, both by the State authority and the courts. The reason was that Mihai's parents had not been registered as ethnic Romanians. According to the authorities, Mihai's had no way to challenge these records and register a different identity.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

The European court ruled that Mihaihad clear links with the Romanian ethnic group. However, under Moldovan law his ethnicity was determined by the records of his parents. This left Mihai with an identity determined by a previous government policy, which he was not able to change. In these circumstances, the Moldovan authorities had failed to safeguard his right to private life. 

Follow-up

In 2012 the Moldovan Parliament changed the law. It decided that, when someone reaches their sixteenth birthday, their ethnicity is registered at their request according to their own wishes. Information on birth certificates and other documents can also be altered at the request of an individual.

Mihai's legal proceedings were re-opened, and the Moldovan courts found in his favour. They ordered the authorities to change the ethnicity on his birth certificate to Romanian.

Themes:

Related examples

Reforms made following the inhuman treatment of a four-year-old girl

When she was four years old, Tabitha Mitunga was held by the Belgian authorities for almost two months – without family, friends, or anybody to look after her. She suffered psychological damage and the European court ruled that her rights had been violated. Her case highlighted the need for better protections for unaccompanied children in Belgium and led to substantial reforms.

Read more

Father wins battle to see his son - and rights for all Czech parents

When Vladimír Zavřel’s wife left the family home, she took the couple’s six-year-old son and stopped Vladimír seeing him. Vladimír got a court order for contact with his boy, but the authorities failed to enforce it. The European court ruled that this had violated the right to family life. Contact was re-established and the law was changed to prevent similar situations happening again.

Read more

Justice for thousands of “erased” people after 20 years without rights

In February 1992, 25,671 people in Slovenia were automatically stripped of their right to live there. Many people – including Ana Mezga - had their papers taken away, were evicted from their homes, could not work, lost personal possessions or had their families broken apart. The law was changed and a compensation scheme set up after a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights.

Read more