Système de rapports de la Charte sociale européenne
Le Comité européen des droits sociaux (CEDS) examine le respect de la Charte en vertu de deux procédures distinctes:
par le biais de réclamations introduites par les partenaires sociaux et d'autres organisations non-gouvernementales (procédure de réclamations collectives) et;
par le biais des rapports nationaux rédigés par les Etats parties (procédure de rapport).
La procédure de rapports est définie dans la partie IV de la Charte de 1961 telle qu'amendée par le Protocole de Turin de 1991 (STE n° 142) qui, bien que n'étant pas entré en vigueur, est appliqué sur la base d'une décision unanime prise par le Comité des Ministres.
The Reporting system: an overview
The European Committee of Social Rights monitors compliance with the Charter under two separate procedures: through collective complaints lodged by the social partners and non-governmental organisations (Collective Complaints procedure) and through reports drawn up by States parties (Reporting system).
The Reporting system is formally governed by Articles 21-29 of the 1961 Charter.
In the framework of the reporting system, States Parties regularly submit a report on the implementation of the Charter in law and in practice.
These reports are examined by the European Committee of Social Rights, which decides whether the national situations they describe comply with the Charter.
The decisions adopted by the Committee in the framework of this monitoring system, called conclusions, are published every year. They can be consulted using the European Social Charter Case law Database (HUDOC Charter).
Insofar as they refer to binding legal provisions and are adopted by a monitoring body established by the Charter, the conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights must be respected by the States concerned; however, they are not enforceable in the domestic legal systems.
In practice, this means that when the Committee rules that the situation in a country is not in compliance with the Charter, one cannot require the Committee’s conclusions to be enforced in domestic law as would be the case with a ruling by a court in the State concerned.
As the decisions adopted by the European Committee of Social Rights in the framework of the Collective Complaints procedure, the conclusions adopted within the reporting system are declaratory; in other words, they set out the law.
On this basis, national authorities are required to take measures to give them effect under domestic law. In this connection, domestic courts can declare invalid or set aside domestic legislation if the Committee has ruled that it is not in compliance with the Charter.
Drafting reports
Following the form for the reports to be submitted in pursuance of the Charter, national reports should give for each accepted provision of the Charter any pertinent information on measures adopted to ensure its application, mentioning in particular:
- the legal framework – any laws or regulations, collective agreements or other provisions that contribute to such application; as well as where relevant pertinent national case-law – relevant decisions by courts and other judicial bodies;
- the measures taken (administrative arrangements, programmes, action plans, projects, etc.) to implement the legal framework;
- any pertinent figures, statistics or any other relevant information enabling an evaluation of the extent to which these provisions are applied.
States parties reports should be accompanied by the principal laws and regulations on which the application of the accepted provisions of the Charter is based.
The reports should, wherever appropriate, specify explicitly:
- whether they are only concerned with the situation of nationals or whether they apply equally to the nationals of the other Parties;
- whether they are valid for the national territory in its entirety;
- whether they apply to all categories of persons included in the scope of the provision.
The information required, especially statistics, should, unless otherwise stated, be supplied for the period covered by the report. Where statistics are requested for any provision, it is understood that, if complete statistics are lacking, States parties may supply data or estimates based on ad hoc studies, specialised or sample surveys, or other scientifically valid methods, whenever they consider the information so collected to be useful and ensuring that the administrative effort required to collect data is in proportion with the desired acquisition of information.
The first State report following the entry into force of the Charter in respect of the State concerned should contain detailed information on all relevant aspects of the provision, whereas for subsequent reports it will suffice to up-date the information on the legal framework given in previous reports.
However, each report should contain appropriate explanations and/or information relating to developments of the situation in practice during the reference period. In addition, it is recalled that each report, except the first report, shall contain replies to any questions raised by the European Committee of Social Rights in its conclusions, whether questions of a general nature addressed to all States (such questions appear in the “general introduction”) or specific questions contained in the conclusions proper in respect of each State for each provision.
The reporting system in motion
In the early 1990s a reform of the reporting system was set in motion. The aim was to make the Charter more effective and efficient. The reform culminated in 1991 in a Protocol amending the Charter. This text improved the reporting system. It confirmed the political role of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe and clarified the powers and responsibilities of the European Committee of Social Rights. The Protocol also increased the participation of the social partners and non-governmental organisations in the system.
Most countries have ratified the abovementioned Protocol, but it has still not come into force. It still requires ratification by, and, in some cases, the signature of four Council of Europe’s member States. Given this situation, in a decision taken unanimously by the States party to the Charter, the Committee of Ministers requested them to envisage the application of certain of the measures provided for in this Protocol before its entry into force, in so far as the text of the Charter will allow. Since 1992 then, and still in accordance with the 1961 Charter, the Reporting system has taken account of the new provisions in articles 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the Protocol in question.
In addition to the innovations arising from the Protocol of 1991 and in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter, the Committee of Ministers has over the years introduced specific rules regarding the presentation of reports by States parties. In response to the difficulties in applying these rules, they have been modified and rationalised on a number of occasions – (cf. Committee of Ministers' decisions adopted in 1984, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1996, 1999 and 2006).
Following the decision taken by the Committee of Ministers in 2006, the provisions the Charter have been divided into four thematic groups. States parties present a report on the provisions relating to one of the four thematic groups on an annual basis. Consequently each provision of the Charter is reported on once every four years.
The four groups of provisions are as follows:
Group 1: Employment, training and equal opportunities / Article 1 - Article 9 - Article 10 - Article 15 – Article 18 - Article 20 - Article 24 - Article 25.
Group 2: Health, social security and social protection / Article 3 - Article 11 - Article 12 - Article 1 - Article 14 - Article 23 - Article 30.
Group 3: Labour rights : Article 2 - Article 4 - Article 5 - Article 6 - Article 21 - Article 22 - Article 26 - Article 28 - Article 29.
Group 4: Children, families, migrants / Article 7 - Article 8 - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 19 - Article 27 - Article 31.
In April 2014, the Committee of Ministers adopted new changes to the Charter’s monitoring system. The most important aim of the changes is to simplify the reporting system for States Parties having accepted the Collective Complaints procedure (see relevant list); the changes can be summarised as follows:
States which have accepted the Collective Complaints procedure will submit a simplified report every two years. To prevent this simplification from causing excessive fluctuations in the workload of the European Committee of Social Rights from year to year, the States which have accepted the collective complaints procedure so far have been divided into two groups. The groups are composed by distributing the States according to the number of complaints registered against them (from the highest to the lowest), as follows:
- Group A, made up of eight States: France, Greece, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria, Ireland, Finland;
- Group B, made up of seven States: Netherlands, Sweden, Croatia, Norway, Slovenia, Cyprus, Czech Republic.
Following the enforcement of these changes, the monitoring system functions as follows:
Normal report |
Simplified report |
|
October 2014 Provisions from Group 4 Children, families, migrants |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from group A |
October 2015 Provisions from Group 1 Employment, training and equal opportunities |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from group B |
October 2016 Provisions from Group 2 Heal, social security and social protection |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from group B |
October 2017 Provisions from Group 3 Labour rights |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from group A |
October 2018 Provisions from Group 4 Children, families, migrants |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from group B |
October 2019 Provisions from Group 1 Employment, training and equal opportunities |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from group A |
October 2020 Provisions from Group 2 Heal, social security and social protection |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from group A |
October 2021 Provisions from Group 3 Labour rights |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from group B |
etc. |
States which draw up a simplified report are required to state what follow-up action has been taken in response to the decisions of the European Committee of Social Rights on collective complaints and reply to any questions put in the event of deferrals for the relevant provisions.
As new States accept the collective complaints procedure, they will be assigned on an alternating basis to Group B then Group A, then to Group B again, and so on. The new system enters into force for all States which have already accepted the collective complaints procedure from October 2014 onwards and, for other States, one year after acceptance.
For more information on the changes described above, it is possible to consult the full document on which the decision of the Committee of Ministers was based (Decision of the Committee of Ministers). Other information on the reform can also be found in the following document: Streamlining and improving the reporting and monitoring system of the European Social Charter
The rules in force
In compliance with the Committee of Ministers’ decisions of 2006 and 2014, States are currently required to drawing up their report on the basis of the following rules:
Reference period |
Thematic groups / Articles |
Date of submission of reports |
Normal report |
Simplified report |
Adoption of the Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights |
|
Group 4 |
31/10/2014 |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from Group A1 |
December 2015 |
01/01/2011- |
Group 1 |
31/10/2015 |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from Group B2 |
December 2016 |
01/01/2012- |
Group 2 |
31/10/2016 |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from Group B2 |
December 2017 |
01/01/2013- |
Group 3 Article 2 |
31/10/2017 |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from Group A1 |
December 2018 |
|
Group 4 |
31/10/2018 |
All states except the ones from group B |
States from Group B2 |
December 2019 |
01/01/2015- |
Group 1 |
31/10/2019 |
All states except the ones from group A |
States from Group A1 |
December 2020 |
_____________
1 States in Group A: France, Greece, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Bulgaria, Ireland, Finland
2 States in Group B: Netherlands, Sweden, Croatia, Norway, Slovenia, Cyprus, Czech Republic
* NB: Articles 20, 21, 22 and 23 of the Revised Charter correspond to Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the 1998 Additional Protocol.
Follow-up by the Committee of Ministers of the Conclusions adopted by the European Committee of Social Rights in the framework of the Reporting system
The Committee of Ministers intervenes in the last stage of the reporting system. After receiving the conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights, the Committee of Ministers adopts a Resolution by a majority of two-thirds of those voting. The resolution closes each supervision cycle and may contain individual recommendations to the States parties concerned.
When the European Committee of Social Rights concludes that a situation is not in conformity, the State Party has to bring the situation into conformity. If the State takes no action, the Committee of Ministers may address a Recommendation to that State, asking it to change the situation in law and/or in practice. In view of the importance of this decision, a two-thirds majority of those voting is required here.
In the case of both resolutions and recommendations, only States parties to the Charter may take part in the vote.
In the framework of the Reporting system, the Committee of Ministers’ work is prepared by the Governmental Committee of the European Social Charter and European Code of Social Security, comprising representatives of the governments of the States Parties to the Charter, assisted by observers representing European employers’ organisations and trade unions (European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), Business Europe (ex UNICE) and International Organisation of Employers (IOE).
Texts adopted by the Committee of Ministers in the framework of the Reporting system are available on line on the Committee of Ministers’ website. It is also possible to retrieve these texts by performing a search on HUDOC Charter data base system.
Ultimately, it falls to the Committee to determine whether the situation has been brought into compliance with the Charter. This is done by the Committee in the framework of the Reporting system or the Collective Complaints procedure.
Les États parties soumettent régulièrement un rapport sur la mise en œuvre de la Charte en droit et en pratique. Les rapports nationaux sont examinés par le CEDS, qui se prononce sur la conformité des situations nationales, décrites dans ces rapports, avec la Charte (voir plus d'informations sur la rédaction des rapports).
Le Comité européen des droits sociaux examine les rapports nationaux et les commentaires reçus de tiers, ainsi que les informations recueillie lors des réunions. Il procède ensuite à une appréciation juridique de la conformité de la situation et adopte des conclusions concernant la mise en œuvre de la Charte sociale européenne par chacun des États concernés.
Les conclusions du CEDS peuvent être consultées sur la base de données HUDOC de la Charte sociale européenne.
Suivi des conclusions du Comité des Ministres
Le suivi des conclusions du CEDS est assuré par le Comité des Ministres. Ses travaux sont préparés par le Comité gouvernemental de la Charte sociale européenne et du Code européen de sécurité sociale (Comité gouvernemental), composé de représentants des États parties à la Charte et assisté d'observateurs représentant les organisations syndicales et patronales européennes : Confédération européenne des syndicats (CES), BusinessEurope (ex UNICE) et l'Organisation internationale des employeurs (OIE).
Sur la base des propositions faites par le Comité gouvernemental, le Comité des Ministres adopte une résolution. La résolution clôture chaque cycle de supervision et peut contenir des recommandations individuelles aux États parties concernés.
Avec l'adoption du paquet de réformes par le Comité des Ministres en septembre 2022, une importance accrue est accordée aux recommandations comme moyen d'engager davantage les États parties à se conformer à la Charte. Cela peut inclure, le cas échéant, des réunions techniques, des échanges de bonnes pratiques et des projets de coopération.
Les textes adoptés par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la procédure de rapport sont disponibles en ligne sur le site du Comité des Ministres. Il est également possible de retrouver ces textes en effectuant une recherche dans le système de base de données de la Charte HUDOC.
Le CEDS est le seul organe habilité à procéder à une évaluation juridique de la conformité d'une situation avec la Charte.
La nouvelle et actuelle procédure de notification
Depuis 2023, suite à la réforme de 2022, les dispositions de la Charte sont divisées en deux groupes et les États parties (n'ayant pas accepté la procédure de réclamations collectives) font rapport sur un groupe tous les deux ans, ce qui signifie que toutes les dispositions acceptées font l'objet d'un rapport tous les quatre ans.
Les États parties ayant accepté la procédure de réclamations collectives font rapport sur un groupe de dispositions tous les quatre ans. Cela signifie que toutes les dispositions acceptées font l'objet d'un rapport tous les huit ans.
Les deux groupes de dispositions se répartissent comme suit :
Groupe 1 : Article 1 - Article 2 - Article 3 - Article 4 - Article 5 - Article 6 - Article 8 - Article 9 - Article 10 - Article 18 - Article 19 - Article 20 - Article 21 - Article 22 - Article 24 - Article 25 - Article 28 - Article 29.
Groupe 2 : Article 7 - Article 11 - Article 12 - Article 13 - Article 14 - Article 15 - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 23 - Article 26 - Article 27 - Article 30 - Article 31.
Afin de donner à la procédure un caractère plus actuel et plus ciblé, des "questions ciblées" sont préparées par le CEDS et le Comité gouvernemental.
Dans le cadre du suivi des réclamations collectives, dans les cas où le Comité des Ministres a adressé des recommandations aux Etats parties après que le CEDS a constaté que la Charte n'avait pas été appliquée de manière satisfaisante, les Etats parties sont invités à soumettre un seul rapport sur le suivi entrepris deux ans après la recommandation du Comité des Ministres. L'évaluation du CEDS sur ces rapports de suivi est transmise au Comité des Ministres. En fonction de l'évaluation du CEDS, le Comité des Ministres peut clore l'affaire par une résolution, ou renouveler la recommandation ou, avant cela, il peut renvoyer l'affaire au Comité Gouvernemental pour de nouvelles consultations.
En plus de la procédure régulière de rapports, la nouvelle réforme introduit la possibilité de demander aux États parties de soumettre des rapports ad hoc sur des situations nouvelles ou critiques ayant une portée large ou transversale ou une dimension paneuropéenne, en vue de leur analyse ou de leur examen par le CEDS. Toutefois, dans le cadre de la procédure de rapports ad hoc, le Comité européen des droits sociaux ne formulera pas de conclusions sur la conformité de la situation avec la Charte. Au lieu de cela, le CEDS pourra, le cas échéant, proposer des orientations générales.
Le CEDS et le Comité gouvernemental décideront du thème et du calendrier des rapports ad hoc.
Le tableaude suivi des rapports
Year |
Submission of Reports |
European Committee of Social Rights’ conclusions |
2023 |
Ad hoc report |
|
2024 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the First Group of provisions |
Possible ECSR analysis of ad hoc reports |
2025 |
16 States that have accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the First Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (First Group of provisions) |
2026 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 16 States (First Group of provisions) |
2027 |
|
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (Second Group of provisions)
|
2028 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the First Group of provisions |
|
2029 |
16 States that have accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (First Group of provisions) |
2030 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 16 States (Second Group of provisions) |
2031 |
|
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (Second Group of provisions) |
2032 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on First Group of provisions |
|
2033 |
16 States that have accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the First Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (First Group of provisions) |
2034 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 16 States (First Group of provisions) |
2035 |
|
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (Second Group of provisions) |
2036 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the First Group of provisions |
|
2037 |
16 States that have accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 27 States (First Group of provisions) |
2038 |
27 States that have not accepted the collective complaints procedure submit reports on the Second Group of provisions |
ECSR conclusions for 16 States (Second Group of provisions) |
Fonctionnement de la procédure de rapport jusqu'en 2022
Suite à la décision prise par le Comité des Ministres en 2006, et jusqu'à la réforme de 2022, les dispositions de la Charte ont été divisées en quatre groupes thématiques. Les États parties étaient tenus de présenter un rapport sur les dispositions relatives à l'un des quatre groupes thématiques sur une base annuelle. Par conséquent, chaque disposition de la Charte fait l'objet d'un rapport tous les quatre ans.
Les quatre groupes de dispositions étaient les suivants :
- Groupe 1 : Emploi, formation et égalité des chances / Article 1 - Article 9 - Article 10 - Article 15 - Article 18 - Article 20 - Article 24 - Article 25.
- Groupe 2 : Santé, sécurité sociale et protection sociale / Article 3 - Article 11 - Article 12 - Article 13 - Article 14 - Article 23 - Article 30.
- Groupe 3 : Droits du travail / Article 2 - Article 4 - Article 5 - Article 6 - Article 21 - Article 22 - Article 26 - Article 28 - Article 29.
- Groupe 4 : Enfants, familles, migrants / Article 7 - Article 8 - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 19 - Article 27 - Article 31.
Les derniers rapports suivant cette procédure portant sur le groupe 4 étaient à transmettre avant le 31 décembre 2022 pour examen par le CEDS en 2023.
Depuis 2014, les États parties ayant accepté la procédure de réclamations collectives doivent soumettre un rapport simplifié tous les deux ans. Afin d'éviter des fluctuations excessives de la charge de travail du CEDS d'une année à l'autre, les États qui ont accepté la procédure de réclamations collectives jusqu'à présent ont été divisés en deux groupes. Les groupes ont été constitués en répartissant les États en fonction du nombre de réclamations enregistrées à leur encontre (du plus élevé au plus bas), comme suit :
- Le groupe A, composé de huit États : France, Grèce, Portugal, Italie, Belgique, Bulgarie, Irlande, Finlande ;
- Le groupe B, composé de huit États : Pays-Bas, Suède, Croatie, Norvège, Slovénie, Chypre, République tchèque, Espagne.
Les rapports simplifiés devaient contenir des informations sur les suites données aux décisions du CEDS en matière de réclamations collectives.
Service des droits sociaux
Conseil de l'Europe
Direction générale des droits de l'Homme et de l'Etat de droit
1, quai Jacoutot
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex
Tél. +33 (0)3 90 21 49 61
www.coe.int/socialcharter