1. Is surrogacy regulated by a specific law in your country? Yes.
Pursuant to section 1 subsection (1), no. 7, of the Act on the Protection of Embryos [Embryonenschutzgesetz, ESchG], a person who undertakes to perform an artificial insemination on a woman who is prepared to give up her child permanently after birth to third parties (surrogate mother) or to transfer a human embryo to her is liable to imprisonment of up to three years or a fine. In such case neither the surrogate mother nor the person who wishes to permanently take care of the child is liable to punishment.
Pursuant to section 13c of the Adoption Placement Act [Adoptionsvermittlungsgesetz, AdVermiG], the procurement of surrogate mothers is prohibited by law in Germany.
2. Is surrogacy regulated in another way? (please specify) NA
3. Has surrogacy been the subject of jurisprudence/court cases in your country? Yes
Domestic surrogacy has not been subject of (civil law) jurisprudence due to strict prohibitions.
So far the courts have delivered only a few judgments dealing with the recognition of foreign judicial decisions issued following an international surrogacy arrangement.
In its leading decision of 10 December 2014, the Federal Court of Justice recognised a judgment from California establishing paternity of two German male nationals on the basis of a surrogacy agreement. The surrogate mother was not married, an anonymous egg donor was used and the child was, therefore, genetically related to only one of the intended fathers.
The Federal Court of Justice held that the recognition of a foreign judgment establishing a legal parent-child relationship between the child and the intended parents does not lead to a result that is obviously incompatible with significant principles of German law (ordre public) if (at least) one of the intended parents is genetically related to the child and the surrogacy mother is not. Whether the intended parents are of the same sex and live in a registered life partnership (or are married) or whether they are of a different sex and are married is not decisive. What is crucial for the possibility of recognition, according to the Federal Court of Justice, is whether or not the child was transferred by the surrogate mother into the care of the intended parents voluntarily – although this was not problematic in this particular case.
According to the Federal Court of Justice, binding the child to the legal maternity of the surrogate mother, as would follow from Section 1591 of the Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – BGB), is not in the child’s best interest, because the surrogate mother does not want to take care of the child and because the foreign state will not acknowledge the legal maternity of the surrogate mother due to the foreign judgment.
The jurisprudence established by the Federal Court of Justice’s ruling has already been referred to by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf in its decision of 7 April 2015 and several other German courts thereafter. The Federal Court of Justice itself subsequently further reaffirmed and specified its case law in two decisions of 5 September 2018 and 12 January 2022.
For instance, it held that the voluntary nature of the surrogate mother's cooperation is not called into question by the fact that the surrogate mother receives money in return or that there is a social disparity between her and the intended or appointed parents.
Recent first instance court decisions point to an even broader recognition of foreign surrogacy judgments, as the genetic link between one of the intended parents and the child has been declared of lesser relevance than the free and informed decision of the surrogate mother to accept the transfer of parenthood to the intended parents as well as the child’s best interests’ assessment.
4. Is there a legal definition of the term “surrogacy”? (please specify) Yes. See answer to question 1.