The Council of Europe has provided legal instruments to define common European social security standards. In addition to the European Social Charter, these valuable tools are the European Code of Social Security, its Protocol and the European Code of Social Security (revised). These international standard-setting conventions can be used for orientation in the reform process going on in many European countries, especially in central and eastern Europe. They require states to alter the substance of their social security systems. They may have to change the amount of benefit or length of the qualifying period.
 

A series of minimum standards

The underlying idea of these instruments is to promote a social security model based on social justice. They represent a series of minimum standards. They do not call for the full standardisation (or ‘unification’ as it is sometimes called) of the national social security systems. Standardisation would require all the contracting parties to provide the same benefits to the same categories of their population at the same rates and under the same conditions. Instead the Code, Protocol and Revised Code recognise the desirability of harmonising the level of social security in member states and therefore establish minimum requirements. If states wish to provide more than the minimum they are free to do so.

The Code, Protocol and Revised Code also respect the diversity and individuality of the national social security systems. All social security systems are different, they are the product of the distinctive social, political and economic traditions of the states in which they have evolved. The provisions of the Code, Protocol, and Revised Code represent goals for every member state of the Council of Europe. They explain what must be achieved but leave every state to determine how it will be achieved. The goals are designed in such a way that they can be applied to all types of social security system, whether entitlement is based on employment, specific categories of occupations, the whole economically active population or upon residence.
 

Supervisory procedure

A supervisory procedure is established and it demands that the contracting parties prepare reports concerning their compliance with the standards provided within the Code, Protocol and Revised Code. Since January 2012, the International Labour Organisations' (ILO) conclusions related to the monitoring of compliance with the European Code of Social Security are now examined by the Governmental Committee of the European Social Charter and the European Code of Social Security who report in turn to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. The Committee of Ministers determines if the contracting party has fulfilled its obligations. If the contracting party has failed to uphold the standards to which it has committed itself then the Committee of Ministers can make Resolutions inviting the contracting party concerned to rectify the situation and respect its international obligations.
 

Governmental Committee of the European Social Charter and the European Code of Social Security
Resolutions 2023 of the Committee of Ministers (adopted on 6 September 2023)


These specialized social security instruments form an essential component of the protection of human rights through the Council of Europe.

Indietro The European Committee of Social Rights publishes its Conclusions on Labour Rights

The European Committee of Social Rights publishes its Conclusions on Labour Rights

The European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) today published its Conclusions 2022 in respect of 33 States on the articles of the European Social Charter relating to Labour Rights.

In the framework of the reporting procedure, the ECSR adopted 611 conclusions: 255 conclusions of conformity with the Charter and 245 conclusions of non-conformity. In 111 cases, the ECSR was unable to assess the situation due to insufficient information ("deferrals").

In the framework of the right to just conditions of work the ECSR found that in some countries the law does not guarantee the right to reasonable weekly working hours for certain categories of workers and noted that in some jobs the working day may exceed 16 hours and even be as long as 24 hours.

In many countries, the ECSR concluded that the work performed on a public holiday is not adequately compensated and that the right of all workers to public holidays with pay is not guaranteed. Also in some countries workers who suffer from illness or injury while on holiday are not entitled to take the days lost at another time.

The information provided to the ECSR on fair remuneration revealed that in a number of countries, the statutory minimum wage or the lowest wages fixed by collective agreements were too low in comparison with the average wage and did not ensure a decent standard of living.

With respect to the obligation by States to promote joint consultation between workers and employers, the ECSR noted the insufficient promotion of collective bargaining and the restrictions on the right to collective bargaining on behalf of a certain category of workers.

The ECSR found, in some cases, that workers are not granted an effective right to participate in the decision-making process within the undertaking about working conditions, work organisation and the working environment, and legal remedies are not available to workers in the event of infringements of their right to take part in the determination and improvement of working conditions and the working environment.

In several countries, the ECSR noted the lack of appropriate and effective redress (compensation and reinstatement) in cases of sexual harassment, and the absence of adequate prevention of sexual harassment in the workplace

The ECSR concluded that, in several countries, preventive measures aimed at ensuring that redundancies do not take effect before employers’ obligation to inform and to consult has been fulfilled (such as recourse to administrative and judicial proceedings) do not exist, as well as the effective sanctions applicable in cases where employers fail to fulfil their obligations, under the Charter, of information and consultation in collective redundance procedures.

Nevertheless, the ECSR noted with satisfaction positive developments in some countries concerning restrictions on the right to strike, and legislative measures concerning the definition and prohibition of harassment and sexual harassment at work.

Also amendments to the labour codes of several countries have introduced regulations aimed at ensuring that person(s) exercising worker’s representation functions do not suffer discrimination or other negative consequences due to their role.

Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, the Netherlands Curaçao, the Netherlands Caribbean part, North Macedonia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Tϋrkiye and the United Kingdom.

 

 Recording of the Press Conference 

 General introduction - European Social Charter

 General introduction - Revised European Social Charter

 Press briefing elements

 Highlights on the Conclusions

  Country profiles

headline Strasbourg 22/03/2023
  • Diminuer la taille du texte
  • Augmenter la taille du texte
  • Imprimer la page

Department of Social Rights

Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law
Council of Europe
1, quai Jacoutot
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex

Tél. +33 (0)3 90 21 49 61

www.coe.int/socialcharter

@CoESocialRights

 

Contact us