11. If surrogacy is forbidden, is the conduct of the following persons criminalised by the law?
a. surrogate mother No
b. intended parent(s) No
c. gamete donor No
d. facilitator Yes
12. Subject to the applicable law, are you aware of the following unlawful practices in your country? The Federal Government is not aware of any of the unlawful practices referred to in a. to e. in Germany. However, since oocyte transfer is prohibited too, German artificial reproduction clinics cannot engage in any form of surrogacy.
a. remuneration of the surrogate No
b. remuneration of the gamete donor No
c. advertising for surrogacy services No
d. remuneration of facilitators No
e. any other unlawful practices (please specify) No
7. If surrogacy is allowed, is it lawful for the surrogate mother to receive:
a. refund of medical expenses N/A
b. refund of other expenses N/A
c. compensation for loss of income N/A
d. other compensation including non-pecuniary N/A
e. remuneration or comparable advantage N/A
9. Is it lawful to advertise surrogacy services? No
10. Is it lawful to remunerate a facilitator/surrogacy agency NA
1. Is surrogacy regulated by a specific law in your country? No. The Health (Assisted Human Reproduction) Bill 2022 (the AHR Bill) was introduced to, and passed Second Stage in, the Dáil (lower House of the Irish Parliament) in March 2022. The focus of this Bill is on the regulation, for the first time in this country, of a wide range of assisted human reproduction (AHR) practices undertaken within the jurisdiction. The Bill as initiated provided for domestic altruistic surrogacy but did not contain provisions to regulate surrogacy arrangements undertaken in other jurisdictions. In March 2024 the Bill passed Committee Stage (Third Stage) in the Dáil. The AHR Bill, as amended at Committee Stage, includes new provisions in respect of the regulation of international surrogacy agreements and the recognition of certain past surrogacy arrangements.
2. Is surrogacy regulated in another way? (please specify) No, but in February 2012, the Department of Justice and Equality issued a guidance document to parents seeking travel documents for children born outside the State as a result of surrogacy arrangements entitled: Citizenship, Parentage, Guardianship and Travel Document Issues in Relation to Children Born as a Result of Surrogacy Arrangements Entered Into Outside the State. A pre-condition of granting emergency travel documents is that the genetic father (intending father) makes an application for a declaration of parentage and guardianship for the child within 10 working days of the arrival of the child into the State.
3. Has surrogacy been the subject of jurisprudence/court cases in your country?
MR and Anor – v- An tArd Chlaraitheoir & Ors [2014]
This case concerned an arrangement whereby a woman agreed to act as a surrogate for her sister and brother-in-law (the commissioning couple). The commissioning couple provided the genetic material (egg and sperm), which ultimately resulted in the birth of twins. The commissioning couple sought to have the birth register altered so that the commissioning couple were both registered as the legal parents. The Registrar refused to do so, on the principle that under Irish law the woman who has given birth to a child is always regarded as the legal mother. That refusal was challenged in the High Court.
In his judgment of 5th March 2013, Judge Abbott found in favour of the commissioning couple. He held that the genetic mother, and not the birth mother, was the mother, and that the person with the genetic/blood link was entitled to be registered as the parent on the birth certificate.
In February 2014, the State appealed Judge Abbott’s decision on the grounds that: it could create uncertainty regarding the parentage and parental rights of children born as a result of egg donation; demean the role of birth mother; lead to an opinion that commercial surrogacy is not unlawful; and result in the Registrar requiring genetic proof of maternity for every birth.
In November 2014 the Supreme Court overturned the High Court decision on the basis that the case had raised important, complex and social issues which are best addressed by the Oireachtas rather than the judiciary.
High Court Ruling:
Supreme Court Ruling: http://www.courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/0/E238E39A6E756AB480257D890054DCB6
4. Is there a legal definition of the term “surrogacy”? (please specify) No.
A legal definition of the term in the AHR Bill, as initiated, is as follows:
“‘surrogacy’ means an agreement, between a woman and the intending parents (or, in the case of a single intending parent, that intending parent) under which the woman agrees to attempt to become pregnant, by the use of an egg other than her own, and, if successful, to transfer the parentage of any child born as a result of the pregnancy to the intending parents (or, in the case of a single intending parent, that intending parent)”.
However, this definition is subject to amendment and may not be the version in the finalised AHR legislation by the time it has passed through all stages in both Houses of the Oireachtas and has been enacted.
1. Is surrogacy regulated by a specific law in your country? Surrogacy is prohibited in Switzerland (see Art. 119 para 2 lit d Swiss Constitution; Art. 4 of the Swiss Reproductive Medicine Act, RMA)
2. Is surrogacy regulated in another way? (please specify) No.
The case law of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court governs the conditions for recognition of parent-child relationships resulting from surrogate motherhood.
Article 119.2 of the Swiss Constitution also contains relevant information: RS 101 - Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation... | Fedlex (admin.ch)
3. Has surrogacy been the subject of jurisprudence/court cases in your country? Yes. A number of cases concern the legal status and adoption of children born through surrogacy abroad (in the United States, for example).
4. Is there a legal definition of the term “surrogacy”? (please specify) Yes. Article 2, paragraph k, of the Federal Law on Medically Assisted Procreation reads as follows: "surrogate mother: a woman who agrees to carry a child conceived by means of a medically assisted procreation method and to hand it over permanently to a third party after the birth;".
13. Who is recognised as the legal parent(s) of a child born following surrogacy?
a. surrogate mother Yes, mother is the woman who gave birth to the child
b. oocyte donor No
c. sperm donor Yes, but if the mother is married, her husband will be considered the father by pater-est. A sperm donor (and intended father) may be able to recognize the paternity instead of the husband.
d. intended mother No
e. intended father No
14. Do mechanisms exist to transfer parentage from the surrogate mother to the intended parent(s) (e.g. adoption procedures)?
Not directly. See also answer to question number five.
If the intended father is also the genetic father (e.g. sperm donor), he will be recognized as legal father of the child unless the surrogate mother is married and there has not been a paternity case, where the husband of the surrogate mother declares that he is not the father of the child.
A spouse or cohabiting partner may apply for a stepchild adoption. However according to Danish regulation, the spouse or partner must have been living with the child for 2½ years before a stepchild adoption may be granted and an adoption decree shall not be issued if any of the parties required to consent to the adoption are to give or receive any kind whatsoever of payments or consideration, including compensation for loss of earnings.
If the intended father is not recognized as a legal father the only option to become legal parent of the child is an adoption, which must be in accordance with the 1993-Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, and therefore is difficult.
15. Is the existence of a genetic link required for establishing paternity/maternity? No.
In Denmark maternity is established by mater est, which means that the woman who gives birth to the child is the legal mother.
Paternity can be established in three different ways:
16. Are the other parties involved mentioned in the birth certificate or other official document connected to the birth?
a. surrogate mother Yes
b. oocyte donor No
c. sperm donor Yes and no
d. intended mother No
e. intended father Yes and no. If the intended father is also the genetic father, it is possible to recognize the paternity (cf. answer to question 13).
17. Are foreign birth certificates in surrogacy cases registered in your country No. According to Article 30 of the Children Act, a woman bearing a child who is the result of medically assisted procreation shall be considered the mother of the child (mater est). In Denmark a foreign birth certificate that indicates another person than the birth mother, as parent of the child will not be recognized. If the birth certificate also mentions a father, that paternity will be recognized if the man is also the genetic father of the child.
11. If surrogacy is forbidden, is the conduct of the following persons criminalised by the law?
a. surrogate mother No
b. intended parent(s)
c. gamete donor
d. facilitator
12. Subject to the applicable law, are you aware of the following unlawful practices in your country?
a. remuneration of the surrogate No
b. remuneration of the gamete donor No
c. advertising for surrogacy services No
d. remuneration of facilitators No
e. any other unlawful practices (please specify) No
5. Is surrogacy prohibited in your country?
a. any form of surrogacy Yes
b. only specific forms of surrogacy (e.g. commercial) (please specify) No.
According to § 13 in the Danish Act on Assisted Reproduction, assisted reproduction cannot be established in relation to an agreement between the woman, who seeks to be pregnant, and someone else, who wishes for her to give birth to a child for them (surrogacy).
1. Is surrogacy regulated by a specific law in your country? Yes.
Pursuant to section 1 subsection (1), no. 7, of the Act on the Protection of Embryos [Embryonenschutzgesetz, ESchG], a person who undertakes to perform an artificial insemination on a woman who is prepared to give up her child permanently after birth to third parties (surrogate mother) or to transfer a human embryo to her is liable to imprisonment of up to three years or a fine. In such case neither the surrogate mother nor the person who wishes to permanently take care of the child is liable to punishment.
Pursuant to section 13c of the Adoption Placement Act [Adoptionsvermittlungsgesetz, AdVermiG], the procurement of surrogate mothers is prohibited by law in Germany.
2. Is surrogacy regulated in another way? (please specify) NA
3. Has surrogacy been the subject of jurisprudence/court cases in your country? Yes
Domestic surrogacy has not been subject of (civil law) jurisprudence due to strict prohibitions.
So far the courts have delivered only a few judgments dealing with the recognition of foreign judicial decisions issued following an international surrogacy arrangement.
In its leading decision of 10 December 2014, the Federal Court of Justice recognised a judgment from California establishing paternity of two German male nationals on the basis of a surrogacy agreement. The surrogate mother was not married, an anonymous egg donor was used and the child was, therefore, genetically related to only one of the intended fathers.
The Federal Court of Justice held that the recognition of a foreign judgment establishing a legal parent-child relationship between the child and the intended parents does not lead to a result that is obviously incompatible with significant principles of German law (ordre public) if (at least) one of the intended parents is genetically related to the child and the surrogacy mother is not. Whether the intended parents are of the same sex and live in a registered life partnership (or are married) or whether they are of a different sex and are married is not decisive. What is crucial for the possibility of recognition, according to the Federal Court of Justice, is whether or not the child was transferred by the surrogate mother into the care of the intended parents voluntarily – although this was not problematic in this particular case.
According to the Federal Court of Justice, binding the child to the legal maternity of the surrogate mother, as would follow from Section 1591 of the Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – BGB), is not in the child’s best interest, because the surrogate mother does not want to take care of the child and because the foreign state will not acknowledge the legal maternity of the surrogate mother due to the foreign judgment.
The jurisprudence established by the Federal Court of Justice’s ruling has already been referred to by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf in its decision of 7 April 2015 and several other German courts thereafter. The Federal Court of Justice itself subsequently further reaffirmed and specified its case law in two decisions of 5 September 2018 and 12 January 2022.
For instance, it held that the voluntary nature of the surrogate mother's cooperation is not called into question by the fact that the surrogate mother receives money in return or that there is a social disparity between her and the intended or appointed parents.
Recent first instance court decisions point to an even broader recognition of foreign surrogacy judgments, as the genetic link between one of the intended parents and the child has been declared of lesser relevance than the free and informed decision of the surrogate mother to accept the transfer of parenthood to the intended parents as well as the child’s best interests’ assessment.
4. Is there a legal definition of the term “surrogacy”? (please specify) Yes. See answer to question 1.
18. Is there:
a. any public discussion about the topic There is an important public debate on this topic, with a public opinion predominantly opposed to surrogacy
b. planning of new regulation at national level The bill approved by the Chamber of Deputies and forwarded to the Senate (No. 824), which incorporates proposals presented in the previous legislature (Nos. 2599 and 306, Chamber of Deputies), extends the application of Italian criminal law to the crime of surrogacy committed by Italian citizens abroad.
19. Please specify any additional relevant aspects which were not mentioned.
Italy brought the Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy case in front of the ECHR (judgment on 27 January 2015). A case of a child born in Russia following a surrogacy arrangement entered into by a couple who had no biological relationship with the child, contrary to allegations made by the applicants. The Italian State declared the child legally available for adoption and placed him under guardianship. The European Court of Human Rights condemned Italy. However, the Italian government appealed this decision and requested that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. Grand Chamber hearing with the Italian government was held on 9 December 2015. With the judgment on 24 January 2017, the ECHR established: “ The Court accepts that the Italian courts, having assessed that the child would not suffer grave or irreparable harm from the separation, struck a fair balance between the different interests at stake, while remaining within the wide margin of appreciation available to them in the present case. It follows that there has been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention”. The ECHR recognized that the measures in question were deemed proportionate to the protection of the overriding interest of the child and essential to avoid recognizing as legitimate a situation created in violation of rules important to the national system.
13. Who is recognised as the legal parent(s) of a child born following surrogacy?
a. surrogate mother Yes, birth mother is the legal mother - see note on the MR and Anor – v- An tArd Chlaraitheoir & Ors [2014] case
If the surrogate mother is married, then under the Status of Children Act 1987, the surrogate mother's husband is presumed by law to be the father of the child. The husband will also, along with the surrogate mother, be the joint guardian of the child.
If the commissioning father is the genetic father of the child, it is possible to overcome the presumption of paternity in favour of the surrogate mother's husband, so as to allow the commissioning father to be recognised as the legal parent of the child. The commissioning father will need to provide evidence of paternity in support of this application.
If the surrogate mother is not married, and the commissioning father is the genetic father of the child, then the Irish authorities may recognise his paternity of the child on receipt of reliable DNA evidence.
As provided for under the Children and Family Relationships Act 2015, gamete/embryo donors are not regarded to be the parent(s) of donor-conceived children.
b. oocyte donor No
c. sperm donor No
d. intended mother No
e. intended father Yes
14. Do mechanisms exist to transfer parentage from the surrogate mother to the intended parent(s) (e.g. adoption procedures)?
See previous note. In addition, it is proposed that the legislation on assisted human reproduction will establish a court-based mechanism for transfer of parentage from the surrogate (and her husband) to the intending parents. At least one of the intending parents will have to be genetically related to the child.
15. Is the existence of a genetic link required for establishing paternity/maternity? As previously stated, the birth mother is automatically regarded as the legal mother under the Irish Constitution. See notes under Q 13 re paternity and Q 14 re transfer of parentage in cases of surrogacy.
16. Are the other parties involved mentioned in the birth certificate or other official document connected to the birth?
a. surrogate mother Yes, birth mother is always the legal mother
b. oocyte donor No
c. sperm donor No
d. intended mother No
e. intended father Yes, so long as he is the genetic father
The proposed legislation will establish a national surrogacy register where the contact details of any person involved in a surrogacy, e.g. sperm or oocyte donor, intending parent and surrogate, will be recorded. Once a person born to a surrogate reaches the age of 18, he or she may access the full information contained in the national surrogacy register, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
17. Are foreign birth certificates in surrogacy cases registered in your country No
1. Is surrogacy regulated by a specific law in your country? No specific law, but specific provisions in more general laws
Article 12 (general prohibitions and penalties), section 6 of Law n°40/2004 on assisted reproduction techniques bans surrogacy (“Whoever, in any form, produces, arranges or advertises the sale of gametes or embryos or surrogate motherhood is punished with imprisonment from three months to two years and a fine ranging from 600,000 to one million euros”).
Pursuant to the Italian Constitution, the combined provisions of Articles 2, 30 and 31 preclude its legitimacy, thereby stating the irreplaceability of both personal and economic duties related to parental responsibility incumbent upon genetic parents, alongside the child’s right to be raised by the latter and to be entitled to a substitute family only when the parents’ incapacity is objectively certified.
In addition, Article 5 of the Italian Civil Code prohibits any actions on one’s own body when causing a permanent damage to physical integrity or when violating Law, public order or decency.
2. Is surrogacy regulated in another way? (please specify) No
3. Has surrogacy been the subject of jurisprudence/court cases in your country? Yes, judgments by Italy’s Supreme Court (n. 24001/2014) and the Constitutional Court (n.162/2014) confirmed the prohibition of Law no.40/2004. Particularly, in judgment n° 162/2004, the Court ruled that “the technique under examination must be strictly restricted to the donation of gametes and kept separate from other different methods, such as “surrogate pregnancies”, which are expressly prohibited under Article 12(6) of Law no. 40 of 2004, the prohibition of which has not been challenged and is not affected in any way and at any point by this ruling, and will hence continue to be valid and effective”.
4. Is there a legal definition of the term “surrogacy”? (please specify) No
11. If surrogacy is forbidden, is the conduct of the following persons criminalised by the law?
a. surrogate mother Yes
b. intended parent(s) Yes
c. gamete donor The sale of gamete is banned, not the donation
d. facilitator Yes
12. Subject to the applicable law, are you aware of the following unlawful practices in your country?
a. remuneration of the surrogate
b. remuneration of the gamete donor
c. advertising for surrogacy services Yes
d. remuneration of facilitators
e. any other unlawful practices (please specify)
7. If surrogacy is allowed, is it lawful for the surrogate mother to receive:
a. refund of medical expenses N/A
b. refund of other expenses N/A
c. compensation for loss of income N/A
d. other compensation including non-pecuniary N/A
e. remuneration or comparable advantage N/A
8. Can the surrogate also be the oocyte donor? NA
11. If surrogacy is forbidden, is the conduct of the following persons criminalised by the law? If they violate article 151b and/or c of the penal code, which prohibits (commercial) mediation with the intend of surrogacy and making public the desire to be a surrogate mother or seeking one. The gamete donor is not included in the prohibition. In the bill that has been sent to Parliament is proposed to decriminalize making public the desire to be a surrogate mother or seeking one.
a. surrogate mother Yes
b. intended parent(s) Yes
c. gamete donor Yes
d. facilitator Yes
12. Subject to the applicable law, are you aware of the following unlawful practices in your country?
a. remuneration of the surrogate No
b. remuneration of the gamete donor No
c. advertising for surrogacy services No
d. remuneration of facilitators No
e. any other unlawful practices (please specify) No
9. Is it lawful to advertise surrogacy services? No
10. Is it lawful to remunerate a facilitator/surrogacy agency No
11. If surrogacy is forbidden, is the conduct of the following persons criminalised by the law? Although there is no law or regulation enacting the conditions of surrogacy in Türkiye, the surrogate motherhood is forbidden by law regarding the familial link article of the Civil Code. The conduct of surrogacy is criminalized by law.
a. surrogate mother
b. intended parent(s)
c. gamete donor
d. facilitator
12. Subject to the applicable law, are you aware of the following unlawful practices in your country? It is known that surrogacy is forbidden by law in Türkiye, the conduct of surrogacy can be done abroad, outside Türkiye Even if it is done by Turkish citizens it cannot be openly revealed because of the familial (parenthood) link legalised by the Civil Code.
a. remuneration of the surrogate
b. remuneration of the gamete donor
c. advertising for surrogacy services
d. remuneration of facilitators
e. any other unlawful practices (please specify)
18. Is there:
a. any public discussion about the topic YES, following the SOU mentioned below.
b. planning of new regulation at national level NO: In the recent publication on the 24th February 2016 “Olika vägar till föräldraskap (SOU 2016:11)” a government inquiry had been issued to consider different ways to increase the possibilities for involuntarily childless people to become parents. That included considering whether to permit altruistic surrogacy, if any, in Sweden. The conclusion was that commercial surrogacy should not be permitted, nor should altruistic surrogacy, in the Swedish health system, and that society should also counter that type of surrogacy. The final report has been submitted to a large number of stakeholders, organisations and authorities, for comments by the 23rd June 2016.
19. Please specify any additional relevant aspects which were not mentioned.
7. If surrogacy is allowed, is it lawful for the surrogate mother to receive: Surrogacy is not allowed
a. refund of medical expenses N/A
b. refund of other expenses N/A
c. compensation for loss of income N/A
d. other compensation including non-pecuniary N/A
e. remuneration or comparable advantage N/A