19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? NA
20. Delegations are invited to provide information, in this section, on particular cases encountered in their country, and especially their case-law.
Homologous insemination in a married couple has no legal incidence: the mother’s spouse becomes the child’s biological father; the means of conception (natural or artificial) has no legal incidence, nor does consent or the lack of it.
Heterologous insemination, on the other hand, raises legal questions concerning filiation. The donor of the sperm is certainly the child’s biological father, but it is impossible to prove legal paternity as the identity of the donor is in principle unknown to the mother and the doctor is sworn to secrecy. Furthermore, no action to prove paternity may be opened in this case as Article 85 para. 1 of the Code of the Family and Guardianship makes sexual intercourse a prerequisite of such action.
The question of the legal paternity of the child thus remains open. In the case of an unmarried woman, action to prove paternity should be excluded, as the donor has the right to remain anonymous. However, if the child is born in wedlock or within 300 days of the marriage being dissolved or annulled, the mother’s husband is presumed to be the legal father. He may take action to contest his paternity within six months of finding out about the birth (art. 63). This is a peremptory time limit, after which only the public prosecutor may institute such proceedings.
The situation is more complex in the event of heterologous insemination carried out with the husband’s consent. As there are no specific legal provisions in the matter, the husband has the right to contest his paternity even though he did give his consent. Theoretically he only needs to prove that the birth was the result of MAP. However, according to a decision of the Court of Cassation on 27 October 1983: “Action by the spouse of the mother contesting paternity of a child born following MAP performed, with said spouse’s consent, with the sperm of another man may be considered contrary to public policy.” In stating its reasons, the Court stressed the importance of the child’s welfare, arguing that if it were to accept an action contesting the father’s paternity of a child born following MAP carried out with his consent using another man’s sperm, the child would, to all intents and purposes, be fatherless; it would be virtually impossible to prove the paternity of the donor because of the rules protecting his anonymity. And the donor has no interest in proving his paternity. This interpretation also takes into account the interests of the family formed subsequent to the couple’s decision to have recourse to MAP.
3. Are MAP procedures covered by the social security system? Infertility is followed free of charge, the healthcare system covering 2 pharmacological treatment cycles and the pre and post implantation. The gametes extraction techniques, fertilisation, implantation and embryo storage at Italian specialised structures are the responsibility of the couple as well as any subsequent treatment cycles to the two provided free of charge.
4. Are there specific criteria for such coverage? No. See comments on relative legal instruments.
5. Is the financial coverage limited to a number of MAP procedures? Yes. See comment to question 3.
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? No
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? Yes
Any women – even being single and without any sexual relationship, and without infertility can go to a specific ART centre and ask for artificial insemination
3. Are MAP procedures covered by the social security system? No
4. Are there specific criteria for such coverage? NA
5. Is the financial coverage limited to a number of MAP procedures? Na
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? Yes
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? Yes
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous?
sperm No / oocytes No / embryos No
Due to amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act – the law overseeing the use of fertility treatment in the UK – donor conceived people born after 1 April 2005 can request identifying information about their donor from the HFEA once they reach 18 years old. This, however, means that there are different information access rights depending on when the donor conceived person was conceived. These are set out below.
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes of embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents No; iii. For a court Yes
The HFE Act 1990 (as amended) allows donor conceived people to apply for non- identifying information about the donor, if available, such as family medical history, hair/eye colour and interests, when they reach 16. If they were conceived after 1 April 2005, when the donor conceived person reaches 18 years old, they may apply to the HFEA to receive identifying information about their donor.
Parents of children conceived through donor conception can access non identifying information about the donor from the HFEA.
Section 34 of the HFE Act 1990 permits the Authority to make disclosure where it is necessary for the purposes of instituting proceedings under the Congenital Disabilities Act.
a. Identity of the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents No; iii. For a court Yes
b. Certain health information concerning the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii. For a court Yes
c. Other information
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii. For a court Yes
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions? Yes.
Whether patients’ own gametes are used in assisted fertility treatment or whether donor gametes are used, where the couple is either married or in a civil partnership, both parents will be the legal parents of any child born from the treatment from the date of birth of the child. The law endeavours to put couples who have had assisted fertility treatment in a similar position to couples who conceive naturally as regards legal parenthood and parental responsibility. It is however possible for the father or second parent (in the case of a female same sex couple who are in a civil partnership) to resist legal parenthood but only where the person can demonstrate that he or she did not consent to their partner’s treatment (see section 35(1) and section 42(1) of the HFE Act 2008).
When donor gametes are used in treatment, and where the couple having treatment is neither married nor in a civil partnership, the second parent (i.e. not the birth mother) can acquire legal parentage if the agreed parenthood conditions are met (see section 37 and 44 of the HFE Act 2008). In cases where the agreed parenthood conditions are not met, parenthood will be in question and in order to establish legal parenthood, the couple would need to seek a declaration of parenthood from Court.
Further information on legal parenthood can be found on these pages of the HFEA website:
https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/becoming-the-legal-parents-of-your-child/
Definitions of mother and father in accordance to (HFE) Act 2008 are as follows:
Meaning of "mother"
(1) The woman who is carrying or has carried a child as a result of the placing in her of an embryo or of sperm and eggs, and no other woman, is to be treated as the mother of the child.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any child to the extent that the child is treated by virtue of adoption as not being the woman’s child.
(3) Subsection (1) applies whether the woman was in the United Kingdom or elsewhere at the time of the placing in her of the embryo or the sperm and eggs.
Meaning of "father"
35 Women married at time of treatment
(1) If -
(a) at the time of the placing in her of the embryo or of the sperm and eggs or of her artificial insemination, the woman was a party to a marriage, and
(b) the creation of the embryo carried by her was not brought about with the sperm of the other party to the marriage, then, subject to section 38(2) to (4), the other party to the marriage is to be treated as the father of the child unless it is shown that he did not consent to the placing in her of the embryo or the sperm and eggs or to her artificial insemination (as the case may be).
(2) This section applies whether the woman was in the United Kingdom or elsewhere at the time mentioned in subsection (1)(a)
19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? As referred to at 18 above, in cases where the agreed parenthood conditions of the HFE Act 2008 have not been met, legal parenthood does not automatically follow for the second parent. In such cases one of the only remedies for the second parent to seek a declaration of legal parenthood from the Court. See for example the recent case (Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam) which can be found here: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/parentage.pdf
20. Delegations are invited to provide information, in this section, on particular cases encountered in their country, and especially their case-law.
R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales & Ors ((2019) EWHC 2384 (Fam))
The case concerns a transgender man (TT) who has a gender recognition certificate (GRC) confirming that he is male for all legal purposes except the limited exceptions set out in the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA). TT had artificial insemination using donor sperm in a licenced fertility clinic, fell pregnant as a result, gave birth to a child, in 2017. He tried to register the birth as the father but was refused by the Registrar General (RG) who was only able to register the birth with TT as the mother. The birth has remained unregistered.
The judgement was handed down on 25 September 2019. The judge supported the Government’s position that a person who gives birth to a child (i.e. including a trans man such as TT) will be the child’s mother. The Government’s view is that the judgment has no effect on the availability of regulated fertility treatment in the UK. The Government considers that regulated fertility treatment is currently, and will remain, equally available to all (trans) women and (trans) men under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Acts.
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous?
NA
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes or embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself NA
ii. For the parents NA
iii. For a court NA
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions?
NA
19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? NA
20. Particular cases encountered in your country, and especially your case-law, in relation to the questions appearing in Sections I and II above
The law on reproductive health is being elaborated. Many aspects of MAP were included during discussions on the draft law.
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous? Yes.
The law adopts the principle of anonymity regarding any donation, therefore, the identity of the donor cannot be revealed under any circumstances.
According to Art 8, para 6 of the new law, medical information that concerns the donor are kept in an anonymous codified form in the Cryopreservation Bank and in the National Registry of Donors and Receivers.
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes of embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii. For a court Yes
The child and his legal representative may have access only to medical data which are kept in secrecy and in a codified form in Cryopreservation Banks.
Law 2472/1997 on the “Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data” qualifies health data as “sensitive” kind of information and stipulates special permission of the Data Protection Authority (Article 7).
According to Art 20, para 3 of Law 3305, access to the National Registry of Donors and Receivers is permitted only to the child and for reasons related to his health, with the permission of the Data Protection Authority and as long as the conditions of Law 2472/1997 regarding protection of personal data are fulfilled. The parents may have access to information only when they act as representatives of the child. The Court may order access.
a. Identity of the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself No; ii. For the parents No; iii. For a court No
The law adopts the principle of anonymity regarding any donation, therefore, the identity of the donor cannot be revealed under any circumstances. The child and his legal representative may have access only to medical data which are kept in secrecy and in a codified form in Cryopreservation Banks.
b. Certain health information concerning the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii. For a court Yes
The child or the parents (acting as representatives of the child) can have access to health information which are kept in secrecy and in a codified form in Cryopreservation Banks but not to the identity of the donor. The Court also may authorize access to health information.
c. Other information
i. For the child him or herself No; ii. For the parents No; iii. For a court No
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions? Yes.
Contestation of maternity and paternity: contestation of paternity is not allowed when the father has provided consent at the beginning of the treatment.
Also, according to Law 3089/02, consent before a notary public of a man and a woman living in a free union takes place in order to guarantee their affiliation with the child to be born. As a result of that, contestation of the voluntary affiliation is forbidden.
In the case of surrogate motherhood, according to the law, the woman to whom the Court’s approval has been given is considered to be the legal mother of the child. Exceptionally, either the commissioning, or the surrogate mother, may contest this in Court, under conditions provided for by the law.
19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? No process of revision is currently foreseen for this Law.
20. Delegations are invited to provide information, in this section, on particular cases encountered in their country, and especially their case-law. NA
16. Is donation of sperm, oocytes and embryos anonymous?
No
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes or embryo donation? For the child? For the parents? For a court?
Yes
In particular: identity of the donors for the child, for the parents, for a court?
Yes
Certain health information concerning the donor(s), for the child, for the parents, for a court?
Yes, details in § 20 Law on Medical Assisted Procreation “Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz”.
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions (family law provisions)?
Yes, under Austrian law, the mother is the woman who gave birth to the child. The father is the husband of the mother, or the man who recognized paternity or whose fatherhood was imposed by the court. The donor of sperm/eggs is excluded by law from fatherhood/motherhood.
Regulations see § 144 and §145 Austrian Civil Code “Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch”
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? No
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? Yes
The national legislation is based on the concepts of a “couple” (that is, a woman and a man living together in marriage or in a relationship comparable to marriage or two women living together in marriage, registered partnership or in a relationship comparable to marriage) and a “person receiving treatment” (a couple or a woman not living in a marriage, registered partnership or a relationship comparable to marriage). The provisions in certain sections of the Act vary depending on whether the treatment is provided to a couple or to a single woman.
Clinics in the public sector have declined to provide MAP to female couples and single women, on the grounds that these services are provided only on the basis of medical indications. Female couples and single women have for this reason sought services from the private sector.
19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? No
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? Yes
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? Yes
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous? sperm Yes/oocytes Yes/embryos No
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes of embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself NA; ii. For the parents NA; iii. For a court NA
a. Identity of the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself NA; ii. For the parents NA; iii. For a court NA
b. Certain health information concerning the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii. For a court NA
c. Other information
i. For the child him or herself NA; ii. For the parents NA; iii. For a court NA
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions? No. In the case of reproduction using a heterologous donor - even if prevented by law - the donor cannot disown the child (Art 9). The mother of the child after MAP cannot declare her wish not to be entered in the birth registers as provided for by dpr no 396 (2000).
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? No
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? No
The 2007 Act makes no mention of such a restriction. Each centre is free to accept or refuse requests from homosexual couples.
1. Is access to medically assisted procreation (MAP)
a. restricted to heterosexual couples? No
b. possible for women not living in a heterosexual couple? Yes
Law n°2021-1017 of 2 August 2021 on bioethics
Order n°2008-480 of 22 May 2008 transposing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on gamete donation and medically assisted procreation
Decree n° 2021-1243 of 28 September 2021 setting the conditions for the organisation and management of medically assisted procreation procedures
Decree n° 2021-1933 of 30 December 2021 setting the conditions for authorising gamete self-preservation activities for non-medical reasons in application of article L. 2141-12 of the public health code and carrying various adaptations to the regulatory part of the same code with regard to the provisions of law n° 2021-1017 of 2 August 2021 relating to bioethics
Date of adoption and entry into force
First bioethics laws adopted in 1994, last revision: Law No. 2011-814 of 7 July 2011, which entered into force on 9 July 2011
Ordinance No. 2008-480 of 22 May 2008, which entered into force on 24 May 2008.
French Bioethics Law n°2021-1017 of 2 August 2021 on bioethics, entered into force on 4 August 2021.
Adoption on 29 June by the National Assembly and promulgation on 2 August 2021
Staggered entry into force according to the implementing texts.
6. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos permitted in your country? Yes
7. Are there specific compensation arrangements for donations of sperm/oocytes/embryos? No
8. Are there specific criteria for donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos? Yes
9. Are there specific non-medical criteria for selection of gametes/embryos to be used for MAP? No
10. Are there special measures for the prevention of consanguinity? Yes
11. In a homosexual couple, is a legal relationship possible between a child and the partner of the legal parent? No
Title of the law: Medically Assisted Procreation and Destination of Supernumerary Embryos and Gametes Act of 6 July 2007
Entry into force 27 July 2007
Published in: the Moniteur belge [Official Gazette] on 17 July 2007, p.38575
Articles 26 and 55, paragraph 2, of the Act, inserted by a law of 10 April 2014 and entered into force on 10 May 2014 provides that if the two authors of the parental project are two women, they are considered as a single woman, when counting the maximum of six women who can give birth to children from gametes or surplus embryos from one donor or donor couple.
19. Is there an important current debate in your country on these or related issues? Yes. Surrogacy is widely discussed in Lithuania
20. Delegations are invited to provide information, in this section, on particular cases encountered in their country, and especially their case-law. NA
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous? No. After reaching the age of 18 a person born from the MAP procedure is allowed to have access to data on identity of biological parent(s).
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes of embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents No; iii For a court Yes
After reaching the age of 18, every person born from a MAP procedure is allowed to have access to data on identity of biological parent(s).
Parents do have a right to access the donor data in the case of medical indication.
Both, child and parents should require data access from the MAP Registry.
a. Identity of the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself, ii. For the parents, iii. For a court NA
b. Certain health information concerning the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents Yes; iii For a court Yes
c. Other information
i. For the child him or herself Yes; ii. For the parents No; iii. For a court Yes
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions? Yes. Contest is regulated within the Family Law. It is possible to contest maternity or paternity only in the cases when MAP procedure was performed without consent.
3. Are MAP procedures covered by the social security system? No. The Ministry of Finance covers the cost of MAP procedures.
4. Are there specific criteria for such coverage? Yes. Specific criteria for such coverage are: (1) infertility (2) for women under 40 years old.
5. Is the financial coverage limited to a number of MAP procedures? Yes. The financial coverage is limited to only one (1) MAP procedure
6. Is donation of sperm Yes/oocytes No/embryos* permitted in your country? Yes.
*Embryo donation per se is not regulated by law. However, the Embryo Protection Act provides that an oocyte may only be artificially fertilised for the purpose of bringing about a pregnancy in the same woman from whom the oocyte has been obtained (Section 1(1) number 2 of the Embryo Protection Act) and that it is prohibited to remove an embryo from a woman before its nidation is completed, in order to transfer it to another woman (Section 1(1) number 6 Embryo Protection Act). In addition, the Embryo Protection Act incorporates provisions aimed to prevent the creation of supernumerary embryos in the course of artificial fertilisation (especially the ban on the artificial fertilisation of more oocytes than can be inserted into a woman within one cycle – Section 1(1) number 5 Embryo Protection Act). Consequently, permissible embryo donation is only conceivable in exceptional instances where an artificially created embryo can unexpectedly no longer be transferred to the woman from whom the oocyte originated.
7. Are there specific compensation arrangements for donations of sperm/oocytes/embryos? No
8. Are there specific criteria for donation of sperm Yes/oocytes/embryos?
Gametes may be used for medically assisted procreation only after full medical assessment and if their use is medically indicated and the protection of the recipient’s and the child’s health is guaranteed (Section 6(1) of the Tissues and Cells Regulation of the Transplantation Act). The use of sperm cells for heterologous fertilisation as a medically assisted procreation technique furthermore requires that the sperm donor is medically assessed as suitable for sperm donation with regard to his age, state of health and medical history and that the use of the donated sperm will not pose any health risks to others. The necessary donor information must be collected by questionnaire and by means of a subsequent personal interview with the donor by the physician.
An age limit exists for eligibility to cost coverage by the health insurance funds (see response to question 4).
9. Are there specific non-medical criteria for selection of gametes/embryos to be used for MAP? No
10. Are there special measures for the prevention of consanguinity? No. As part of a voluntary commitment physicians, sperm banks and laboratories have limited the number of offspring from a sperm donation to 15 (Richtlinien des Arbeitskreises für Donogene Insemination zur Qualitätssicherung der Behandlung mit Spendersamen in Deutschland).
11. In a homosexual couple, is a legal relationship possible between a child and the partner of the legal parent? Yes.
German law includes the following provisions governing the legal relationship between the child and the spouse of the legal parent:
Pursuant to Section 1741(2) sentence 4 of the Civil Code/Section 9(7) sentence 1 of the Act on Registered Life Partnership, a spouse/registered partner is entitled to adopt his or her spouse’s/registered partner’s biological child. According to Section 1742 of the Civil Code/Section 9(7) sentence 2 of the Act on Registered Life Partnership, a spouse/registered partner may also adopt the child adopted by his or her spouse/registered partner. There is no longer a distinction between heterosexual and homosexual married couples, registered partners or between married and unmarried stable couples in case they want to adopt the child of their partner (Section 1766a of the Civil Code). In addition, married couples regardless of the sex of the spouses may adopt any other child as common parents, whereas unmarried couples and registered partners do not have this option to become common parents of the child simultaneously. They have to adopt the child successively.
3. Are MAP procedures covered by the social security system? Yes
MAP is a medical therapy under Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code.
The medical services covered by the statutory health insurance also include medical interventions aimed to induce a pregnancy. MAP measures must be medically diagnosed as necessary and have reasonable chances of success.
The Statutory Health Insurance Modernisation Act [GKV-Modernisierungsgesetz] reasonably restricted the entitlement to MAP measures from 1 January 2004 onwards. Since then Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code specifies that 50% of the costs are covered by the health insurance fund, so that the insured equally share in the costs of MAP interventions with a co-payment of 50%.
To reduce the financial burden caused by the 2004 cutback in costs covered by the statutory health insurance fund, in 2012 the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs launched the federal initiative “Hilfe und Unterstützung bei ungewollter Kinderlosigkeit” (assistance and support for involuntary childlessness). The funds are paid from both the federal budget and the budget of the Länder in which the couples concerned have their principal residence. Currently, twelve of the sixteen Länder participate in the initiative. Federal funding is generally provided for the first four treatment cycles of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Couples can be reimbursed up to 25 per cent of the share they have to pay in addition to the costs covered by the health insurance fund.
Until 2015, only married couples were entitled to additional federal financial assistance. Today, also unmarried couples living in a non-marital long-term relationship can receive federal financial assistance under the amended federal guidelines on financial assistance for assisted reproduction procedures (Richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen zur Förderung von Maßnahmen der assistierten Reproduktion), which took effect on 7 January 2016. However, pursuant to Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code, entitlement to benefits from the statutory health insurance fund is still restricted to married couples only.
4. Are there specific criteria for such coverage? Yes.
The criteria included in Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code:
Coverage of part of the costs by the statutory health insurance funds is subject to the following requirements:
Any method other than homologous fertilisation is excluded from the mandatory package of benefits and services of the statutory health insurance system.
The restriction of eligibility to married couples is in accordance with the German Constitution (cf. Judgment of 28 February 2007 – 1 BvL 5/03, BVerfGE 117, 316).
Eligibility is subject to age limits of between 25 and 40 years for women and between 25 and 50 years for men.
Although unmarried heterosexual couples are not entitled to benefits from the statutory health insurance fund pursuant to Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code, they can receive the voluntary financial assistance offered through the federal initiative “Hilfe und Unterstützung bei ungewollter Kinderlosigkeit”.
5. Is the financial coverage limited to a number of MAP procedures? Yes. Pursuant to Section 27a of Book V of the Social Code three attempts to induce a pregnancy are partially covered by the health insurance funds. The payment of expenses by the health insurance funds has been limited to 50% of the costs approved along with the treatment schedule.
16. Is donation of sperm/oocytes/embryos anonymous?
LHC: no specific provisions are included in the LHC on this issue.
*DL-RHRR:
Donation of gametes and embryo is not anonymous; however information on the identity of a gamete donor is confidential. Also, any personal data collected about a couple or single women applying for MAP is confidential.
United Register of Gamete Donors will include data about the identity of gamete donors as well as of couple.
These data are confidential. However, the law may make exceptions for specific cases; e.g. “when the disclosure of information on the donor’s genetic characteristics is necessary for the health purposes of the child, born as a result of medically assisted reproductive technologies”.
17. Is it possible to obtain information about the biological origin of a child born after gametes of embryo donation?
i. For the child him or herself; ii. For the parents; iii. For a court Yes. LHC: no specific provisions are included in the LHC on this issue. The answers given to question 17 are based on DL-RHRR.
a. Identity of the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself; ii. For the parents; iii. For a court No
b. Certain health information concerning the donor(s)
i. For the child him or herself; ii. For the parents; iii. For a court Yes. Health data of the gamete donor, particularly information about the donor’s genetic characteristics, could be disclosed from the register of gamete donors if this is necessary for the health purposes of the child, born as a result of MAP.
c. Other information
i. For the child him or herself NA; ii. For the parents; Yes. A couple or a single woman has the right to request and receive information on the donor’s age, appearance, ethnic background, and health condition.
According to the DL-RHRR gamete donors are obligated “to give the medical personnel complete and comprehensive information on his/her health condition prior to gamete donation.”
According to the DL-RHRR gamete donors are entitled to receive “information concerning his/her own health, which may be discovered as a result of monitoring the child born after utilizing assisted reproductive technologies.”
iii. For a court NA
18. Is it possible to contest maternity and paternity of children born utilising MAP and under which conditions? There are no specific provisions on this subject in family law at present.